“a trend toward significance”

Compared with M group, less fibrosis was observed in the MP group which suggested a trend toward significance ( P = 0.0401) (Fig. 2 f).

Fifty-seven patients with AAS + at baseline developed VS in 22.8% at >5-year follow-up, which was higher than those without instability at baseline (11.4%) with a trend toward significance (p = 0.041).

The only parameter that showed a trend toward significance was the incidence of heart failure during hospitalization (p=0.042).

Another haplotype, CCCCTAGTTC, in block 3 showed a trend toward significance in the haplotype-level logistic regression analyses ( P =0.043).

Using a vertical brushing method trends toward a negative impact on tooth sensitivity, although this trend is not statistically significant, while the combination method shows a trend toward significance with a p-value of 0.043 (B = -5.249, SE = 2.587, p-value = 0.043, and Exp (B) = 0.005).

Nevertheless, we saw a trend toward significance for the Shannon index, supported by a significant Friedman’s test ( P = 0.044) but a non-significant post hoc test (Wilcoxon signed-rank test; P = 0.375 for all comparisons) (see Table S3 at https://github.com/evetb/DSS_Manuscript ).

There was a trend toward significance ( p = 0.045) indicating increased levels of proNGF in aDS compared to sDS (Figure 4A ).

A trend toward significance was noted for sex, with a higher proportion of females achieving fusion (46.7% males, 53.3% females, P=0.045).

A significant interaction for APOE ε4 carriage and time ( P = 0.001) and a trend toward significance for the three‐way interaction (moderate/severe sleep disturbance, P = 0.046, sleep duration category < 6 hours, P = 0.085, and sleep efficiency category 65%–85%, P = 0.070) confirmed modeling stratified for APOE ε4 carriage was warranted.

However, although HbA1c showed a trend toward significance ( P = 0.046), but did not meet the Bonferroni-adjusted threshold ( P > 0.025).

[ 74 ] and the present study demonstrated a trend toward significance ( p = 0.047).

Advice cue ERPs Analysis of ERPs segmented for different advice cues revealed a trend toward significance at the P3a component [ F (2, 40) = 3.30, p = . 047; Fig. 3 d].

The association between dizziness and vestibular test findings was not statistically significant in most categories, there was a trend toward significance for abnormal ocular VEMPs in patients with dizziness (42.1% vs. 15.4%, p = 0.047) (Table 5 ).

Males demonstrated significantly greater pedicle width than females at T12 (P = 0.009) and L1 (P = 0.004), with a trend toward significance at L2 (P = 0.048).

Also, looking into the model parameters, years of experience of the matching played-observed positions were the only regressors showing a trend toward significance (PsA Corrected, L : β 3 = 0.005, p = 0.049; PsA Corrected, G : β 4 = 0.008, p = 0.058).

Moreover, in the amyloid connectome, we observed a significant time × diagnosis interaction for the AD group ( p = 0.002) and a trend toward significance for the MCI group ( p = 0.049), relative to the CN group.

9 In their study, although the radiomic biomarker on 303 lesions from the 70 patients of the test set reached significant predictive performance (0.66 AUC, p<0.01), only a trend toward significance was obtained from the nodal metastases in melanoma patients (AUC=0.64, p=0.05), and application of the signature was not significant for pulmonary and hepatic melanoma lesions (AUC=0.55).

There was a trend toward significance with the conditioning regimen ( p = 0.05) and intensity of conditioning (myeloablative versus. reduced intensity; p = 0.07).

We noticed a trend toward significance for IFNα at both baseline and one month post treatment (unadjusted p-value <0.05).

However, it should be mentioned that the p -value showed a trend toward significance, suggesting a possible impact of unsuccessful liberation from VV-ECMO on mortality ( p = 0.05).

It is plausible that this node could be used as a “compensatory mechanism” during social situations in ASD individuals, although our results only show a trend toward significance ( p = .05) so we must consider this result with caution.

For the Bias scores both groups did better during the ‘post’ session and overall the CG had a better bias score but no difference was significant: the ANOVA revealed a trend toward significance for the main effect of Session, F (1,46) = 4.03, p = 0.05, η 2 p = 0.08 with both groups increasing their scores in the post-testing session, and there was a non-significant trend in the main for Group as well, F (1,46) = 3.72, p = 0.06, η 2 p = 0.075 with the CG trending toward higher scores.

Within-Group Analysis The repeated-measures ANOVA on recognition accuracy (measured as the frequency of correct responses) revealed a trend toward significance for the emotion*session*group interaction (F (5,165) = 2.231; η 2 = 0.062; p = 0.05). 3.2.2.

Obesity remained a significant predictor in univariate analysis of PFS (HR: 0.44 (95% CI: 0.24 to 0.81), p=0.01) and OS (HR: 0.24 (95% CI: 0.07 to 0.80), p=0.02), with a trend toward significance in multivariable analysis of PFS (HR: 0.52 (95% CI: 0.27 to 1.00), p=0.05) and OS (HR: 0.28 (95% CI: 0.08 to 0.99), p=0.05).

The AirINTrial, which involved 500 lung resection patients, found that the incidence of prolonged air leakage (defined as still having a chest drain in place 7 days after surgery) was not significantly different in patients in whom external suction was used, compared to those without suction (10% versus 14%, respectively, P = 0.2), although a trend toward significance favoring the use of external suction was seen in patients undergoing anatomical resection (9.6% versus 16.8%, P = 0.05) (Leo et al. 2013 ).