Barely Significant
← all phrases

“a trend toward significance”

3,730 sentences · 3,730 papers · 5,089 search hits before verification

In the literature

a trend toward significanceP = .0290.6× alpha
In 2 other vGRF variables, a trend toward significance was observed with reduced eccentric peak force ( P = .029; d = 0.35) and RFD ( P = .049; d = 0.34) in the AGP–Pre group versus the CON group, although these did not reach the criterion of ≥85% consistency in the permutation analysis.
a trend toward significanceP = 0.030.6× alpha
In contrast to the findings noted in women, higher plasma phospholipid DHA was associated with a trend for increased ejection fraction in men ( P = 0.05; Figure 1(b) ); formal gender × DHA interaction tests also showed a trend toward significance ( P = 0.03).
a trend toward significancep < 0.030.6× alpha
Also the controls in the vertical condition located the subjective midpoint more above the true center (vertical condition, left hand: t = 3.46, p < 0.006, d = 1.41, right hand: t = 3.29, p < 0.008, d = 1.34), whereas a trend toward significance was present for the radial condition (radial condition, left hand: t = 2.52, p < 0.03, d = 1.03, right hand: t = 2.73, p < 0.02, d = 1.12).
a trend toward significancep = 0.030.6× alpha
Similarly, the association between WMH and global cognition as well as attention remained, while the associations between WMH and executive function or language showed a trend toward significance when adding Aβ-SUVR as a covariate in addition to adjustment for type-2 diabetes-related characteristics and ICV (β = − 0.02, SD = 0.01, p = 0.03 for global cognition, β = − 0.03, SD = 0.01, p = 0.03 for attention, β = − 0.02, SD = 0.01, p = 0.06 for executive functions, and β = − 0.02, SD = 0.01, p = 0.06 for language, Table 4 B).
a trend toward significanceP=0.0330.7× alpha
In the final multivariate model for ACN ( Table 2 ), independent predictors were identified as follows: age ≥60 years (OR=3.46, 95% CI 1.30–9.21), current smoking, which demonstrated a trend toward significance (OR=1.95, 95% CI 0.92–4.11), and a family history of CRC in first-degree relatives (OR=4.43, 95% CI 1.43–17.32, P=0.033).
a trend toward significancep = 0.0370.7× alpha
Individual chi-square tests revealed a significant association between active or not active behavior and visitor density level for all three fiddler rays (fiddler 1: χ 2 = 16.392, p < 0.001; fiddler 2: χ 2 = 10.274, p = 0.016; fiddler 3: χ 2 = 27.306, p < 0.001), as well as a trend toward significance for southern stingray 3 (χ 2 = 8.486, p = 0.037) and southern stingray 2 (χ 2 = 7.401, p = 0.060.