Barely Significant
← all phrases

“a trend toward significance”

3,730 sentences · 3,730 papers · 5,089 search hits before verification

In the literature

a trend toward significancep = 0.061.2× alpha
Follow-up one-way ANOVAs at each Load indicated no significant main effects of Group, though a trend toward significance was observed at load 6 ( p = 0.06) with post hoc tests indicating a trend ( p = 0.08) toward deficient deactivation in the ESZ relative to the HC, similar to the pattern observed in the PCC.
a trend toward significancep < 0.061.2× alpha
Autonomic function at baseline and after the intervention during the fMRI session The overall MANOVA for the parameter heart rate during scanning, RMSSD during scanning and vagal threshold during exercise showed a trend toward significance for the Group (exercise group vs. control group) × Time (before vs. after intervention) interaction ( F = 2.74; p < 0.06).
In sensitivity analysis, excluding persons with undiagnosed diabetes who were initiated on glucose-lowering therapies during follow-up (excluding 15 men and 18 women), we found that the association was more significant for FPG (−0.49±0.19 kg per SD increase, p=0.01; SD=13 mg/dL) and grip strength, with a trend toward significance for 2HG (−0.40±0.21 kg per SD increase, p=0.06; SD=42 mg/dL), among men in fully adjusted models, compared with the primary analysis.
a trend toward significancep = 0.061.2× alpha
Location-action A trend toward significance was observed between treatments on day 1 ( F (1,127) = 3.77, p = 0.06) with the mean number of correctly remembered locations and actions significantly higher for the multi-ingredient herbal supplement (4.26) than placebo (3.56).
In the univariate analysis, classical risk factors showed variable associations; hypertension showed a trend toward significance (p=0.06), while diabetes (p=1.00), atrial fibrillation (p=1.00), and previous stroke (p=0.39) did not reach statistical significance as individual predictors.
a trend toward significancep < 0.061.2× alpha
Post-hoc contrasts showed a significant interaction of the between-participant group factor (low ES, high ES) with the within-participant contrast between the neutral and the pleasant condition [ F (1, 22) = 4.842, p < 0.04] and a trend toward significance for the contrast between the neutral and the unpleasant condition [ F (1, 22) = 4.009, p < 0.06].