a trend toward significancep = .06
After multivariate logistic regression analysis, SOT status had a trend toward significance (odds ratio [OR] 1.29; 95% CI 0.99–1.69, p = .06).
After multivariate logistic regression analysis, SOT status had a trend toward significance (odds ratio [OR] 1.29; 95% CI 0.99–1.69, p = .06).
non-injured p = 0.031; Figure 7 B) and a trend toward significance in the caudal zone at 7 dpi (F 2,6 = 4.48, p = 0.06; Tukey test p = 0.051; Figure 7 B).
The subsequent mf values were similar to those in condition B; a trend toward significance was noted ( P = 0.06).
LV weight indexed to body weight was related to increased TNF-α (r = 0.44; p = 0.01) and there was a trend toward significance with IL-6 (r = 0.34; p = 0.06).
Although this difference was not statistically significant, there was a trend toward significance (mean difference: −18; 95% CI, −34.5 to −1.5; p = 0.06).
These differences had a trend toward significance ( p = 0.06, unpaired t -test).
Across the 2 surveys, the lowest mean score on usefulness statements (4.46, SD 1.38) was in response to “Using the ECHO framework makes it easier to do my job,” while the highest mean score (5.23, SD 1.33) was for “Using the ECHO framework for cybersecurity improves the quality of work I do.” In comparing responses to “Using the ECHO framework for cybersecurity improves the quality of the work I do” between participants in HICs and LMICs between 1- and 3-month surveys, there was a trend toward significance in the LMIC subgroup analysis over time ( P =.06), where the mean Likert score reduced from 6.12 (SD 0.99) to 4.42 (SD 1.90; Figure 4 ), but this was not statistically significant.
Mutation of serine 155 to tryptophan or lysine 241 to alanine caused reductions in the LyTASK currents (Figure 6 A, Table 1 ); these reductions were not significant compared to wild-type (Figure 6 A, Table 1 ), but in the case of the S155W mutant there was a trend toward significance ( p = 0.06).
To evaluate the significant between group differences, we performed independent t-test comparisons and found a significant difference between the two groups for CTOA100 (HP:69.15%, LP:62.18%), t (51) = 2.26, p = .02, and a trend toward significance for the CTOA300 (HP: 49.88%, LP: 41.20%), t (51) = 1.90, p = .06, and CTOA500 (HP: 41.95%, LP: 33.04%), t (51) = 1.7, p = .09, conditions.
VIQ scores were significantly lower in the MCI group than in the normal aging and AAMI groups, p s < .01, and there was a trend toward significance for AMNART scores to be higher in the MCI group than in the normal aging group, p < .06.
In a study by Kumar et al., the observed difference in infection rates between well-nourished and malnourished children during the induction phase of treatment shows a trend toward significance (p=0.06) [ 33 ].
The interaction between delay interval, age, and educational track showed a trend toward significance [Greenhouse–Geisser F (1.77,1098.32) = 2.34, p = 0.06].
A trend toward significance was also observed in the number of patients undergoing short therapy, and greater in the over 80 year patients ( P = 0.06).
Accordingly, LVEDD and LVESV reductions from baseline were statistically significant only in patients younger than 6 years ( p = 0.038 and p = 0.007, respectively), whereas LVEDV showed a trend toward significance ( p = 0.06).
There was a trend toward significance ( p = 0.06) for an interaction effect (group * time * day) for TBARS (Table 3 ).
However, both Congruency and Electrode showed a trend toward significance, with values F (1,42) = 3.69, p = 0.06, and F (4,168) = 3.01, p = 0.05, ε = 0.50, respectively.
In K-Means clustering, propionate levels differed significantly ( p = 0.010), with acetate showing a trend toward significance ( p = 0.06), while butyrate differences were not statistically significant.
Thus, while controls showed differentiation between Show and No-Show events in the Human Opponent runs as expected (this difference in the Computer Opponent runs showed significance on the right MTG: t = 2.62, p = 0.01 and only a trend toward significance on the left ( t = 2.04, p = 0.06)), ASD subjects showed no differentiation between the Human Show and No-Show conditions with a much weaker main effect of Opponent Type (due to a differentiation between the Computer Show and No-Show events; see Fig. 3 C and D). 3.2.3.
More interestingly, we identified a significant difference in the intermediate bacterial population based on Simpson index (p = 0.03) and a trend toward significance based on Shannon index (p = 0.06) ( Table 1 ).
The standardized parameter estimates in Table 3 indicated that the alliance with the therapist delivering TAU at the outpatient service at baseline was associated with all aspects of patient motivation to change (i.e., autonomous motivation, ability and importance to change and a trend toward significance for controlled motivation, p = 0.06).
We found that there were no differences in nonadherence to laboratory testing for all laboratory tests, although there was a trend toward significance for anti-dsDNA testing (4/136, 2.9% nonadherence for in-person visits vs 13/153, 8.5% nonadherence for telemedicine visits; P =.06; Table 4 ), but it was not statistically significant.
At the remaining time points, this difference showed a trend toward significance ( p = 0.06–0.09).
There was a trend toward significance ( P = 0.060) for the participants ( n = 9) treated with antidiabetics at the start of ChEI treatment to exhibit also a shorter time spent in NHs.
In addition, patients reacted slower with explicit compared to neutral stimuli in the background (T(37) = 3.195, p = 0.003), while in healthy controls, only a trend toward significance could be detected (T(30) = 1.956, p = 0.060), which points towards faster reaction times in the explicit conditions (see also Fig. 1 b).
However, if subjects forcefully contracted the FDI of Hand-2, the FDI of Hand-1 also became activated [force: F (1.2,21.5) = 4.37, p = 0.04; RMS-EMG: F (1.3,23.1) = 5.20, p = 0.03, Figure 4 A; larger force in Hand-1 when ipsilateral hand contracted at 50% ( p = 0.02) and a trend toward significance at 70% of MVC ( p = 0.06); larger RMS-EMG in Hand-1 when the ipsilateral hand contracted at 70% of MVC ( p = 0.03)].