Barely Significant
← all phrases

“a slight trend”

4,079 sentences · 4,079 papers · 4,917 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p<0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

a slight trendP =0.03690.7× alphagold
Results There was a slight trend (despite did not reach statistical significance) of the EG group (which have a significantly [ P =0.0369] higher mean [8.8±7.6] of military service time [in years] when compared to NG group [5.8±6.0]) presenting higher values of anxiety-trait (+5.0%) and depression (+16.0%) and lower levels of leisure time HPA (–3.7%) than NG group.
a slight trendp = 0.0380.8× alphagold
There was a slight trend for the RT facilitation to be larger for the patient than controls at 250 ms ( p = 0.038) but this did not pass the Bonferroni corrected threshold of p < 0.0125 (correction based on performing 4 Bayesian Difference Tests for 4 shorter ISIs where controls showed a facilitation effect induced by cue validity).
a slight trendp = 0.04090.8× alphagold
While slight changes are observed in the thyroid profile, specifically a slight trend toward an increase in T4 in the male PFBA-treated litters, a substantial decline was found in the testosterone blood level in both GenX- (Student’s t-test, p = 0.0409) and PFBA-exposed male rats (Student’s t-test, p = 0.0268) and in progesterone in GenX-exposed female rats (Student’s t-test, p = 0.0174). 3.2.
a slight trendp = 0.0481.0× alphagold
Only very few IL-17 + lymphocytes were detected in either cancer subtype (ductal: 1.4 ± 3.0; lobular: 2.4 ± 5.4, p = 0.046), with a slight trend towards relatively higher counts in the stromal compartment of lobular as compared to ductal carcinomas (1.1 ± 2.3 vs. 1.8 ± 3.4; p = 0.048).
a slight trendp > 0.051.0× alphagold
Our results showed no differences in cold hypersensitivity, expressed as latency to lick the paws, between the two experimental groups, although a slight trend to reduction could be appreciated ( Figure 1B , Two-Way ANOVA for repeated measures, followed by Šídák’s multiple comparisons test, F (3, 36) = 1.599, p > 0.05 n. s., Aβ vs sham).
a slight trendp > 0.051.0× alphagold
Elevated 50 kHz calling by Ube3a mat–/pat+ was also specific to being provoked by heterospecific play, as 50 kHz and short 22 kHz USV production was normal during exploration of an empty cage (albeit a slight trend toward more 50 kHz USV; Fig. 1 H ; 50 kHz, U = 374.5, p > 0.05; 22 kHz, U = 433, p > 0.05, d = 0.56) and in response to the acoustic presentation of 50 kHz USVs ( Fig. 1 I ; 50 kHz, U = 53, p > 0.05; 22 kHz, U = 44.50, p > 0.05).