Barely Significant
← all phrases

“a possible trend”

1,411 sentences · 1,411 papers · 1,921 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

Concerning the comparison between the C and T groups, although none of the genera passed the pre-specified false discovery rate threshold (q < 0.1) for significance, the genera Acinetobacter , Psychrobacter , and Bacteroides , underexpressed in the T group, showed relatively low p -values and consistent effect sizes, suggesting a possible trend toward group-specific differences. 3.2.
Meta-analytic evidence suggests a possible trend towards reduced risk of HDP with supplementation, although the authors emphasised low certainty because of methodological limitations across trials. 22 Similarly, the Cochrane review concluded that current evidence is insufficient to recommend routine magnesium supplementation for HDP prevention. 23 The characteristics and findings of interventional studies are summarised in Table 2 .
The 35% response rate in WHO grade III astrocytoma (anaplastic astrocytoma) ( Yung et al , 1999 ) in comparison to 6–8% response rate in grade IV tumours (glioblastoma multiforme) ( Yung et al , 2000 ; Brada et al , 2001 ) suggests a possible trend of increasing efficacy in lower grade tumours previously noted for nitrosourea-containing chemotherapy ( Rajan et al , 1994 ).
Fluorescence spectroscopy of tissue lysates from PEG-DMG-LNP-treated animals revealed no statistically significant differences in tumor accumulation but showed a possible trend towards more tumor accumulation when animals were pre-treated with liposomes for both Cy5.5 (control 3.17 % vs liposomes 5.92 %) ( Fig. 3 f) and Cy7 (control 3.61 % vs liposomes 7.04 %) ( Fig. 3 g).
In order to deduce a possible trend that can be a starting point for further studies, we make an interpretation attempt: modules exhibiting correlations with the lowest p -value were M8 (k = 0.393; p = 0.149 for 5% O 2 ; k = −0.293; p = 0.295 for 0–21% O 2 oscillations), M13 (k = 0.358; p = 0.193 for 0–95% O 2 oscillations), M14 (k= 0.324; p = 0.243 for 95% O 2 ), M0 (k = −0.271; p = 0.334 for 0–21% O 2 ) and M2 (k = −0.251; p = 0.372 for 0–21% O 2 ).