Barely Significant
← all phrases

“a positive trend”

11,006 sentences · 11,006 papers · 20,836 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

a positive trendp = 0.1823.6× alphagold
Multivariate regression analyses ( Table 5 ) showed a positive trend between maternal hair Hg and birth weight (β coefficient = 154.6; 95% CI = −73.29–382.5; standard error = 115.0; p = 0.182), and an opposite effect on birth length (β coefficient = −0.089; 95% CI = −1.518–1.340; standard error = 0.721; p = 0.902), after adjusting the effects of babies’ gender, gestational age, and maternal BMI before pregnancy and education, but the association was not statistically significant. 4.
a positive trendp = 0.204.0× alphagold
did not reach statistical significancep = 0.204.0× alphaplainly factual
The primary clinical endpoint of death or mechanical ventilation from day 6 to 29 in patients with high viral load had a positive trend towards a reduction in treated patients, that did not reach statistical significance [relative risk reduction (RRR) 25.5%; 95% CI –16.2, 52.2; p = 0.20].
a positive trendp = 0.24.0× alphagold
Despite a positive trend, neither cardiac medication as a whole (increase RVEF 12 ± 6% vs 9 ± 5%, p = 0.2), nor individual medications (digoxin: 14 ± 3% vs 10 ± 6%, p = 0.2; ACEi/ARB: 12 ± 6% vs 9 ± 5%, p = 0.2; diuretics: 13 ± 5% vs 10 ± 6%, p = 0.4) were significantly associated with a higher increase in RVEF compared with those without cardiac medication.
a positive trendp = 0.2074.1× alphagold
There was an advantage of 1.0% in 30-days survival for private residences in the unadjusted analyses ( p < 0.001), while the adjusted longitudinal model displayed a positive trend in annual survival odds in both private residences (5.6%) and in nursing homes (3.5%), with no difference between the groups ( p = 0.207).
a positive trendp = 0.214.2× alphagold
did not reach statistical significancep = 0.214.2× alphaplainly factual
When stratified by sex, this association remained statistically significant only among women (r2 = 0.126, p < 0.05) (Figure 1B ), whereas in men the relationship did not reach statistical significance despite a positive trend (r2 = 0.07, p = 0.21) (Figure 1C ).