Barely Significant
← all phrases

“a positive trend”

11,006 sentences · 11,006 papers · 20,836 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

a positive trendp = 0.244.8× alphagold
However, a positive trend was observed between higher maternal BMI and milk volume (β = 17.1, 95% CI: -14.8 to 49.1, p = 0.24), and infants receiving formula tended to consume greater volumes of milk compared to exclusively breastfed infants, although this association was not statistically significant (β = 61.5, 95% CI: -165.9 to 288.9, p = 0.58).
a positive trendp = .255.0× alphagold
Correlations between predictor variables and metrics of trophic overlap were not significant (Table 3 ), although fish–jellyfish overlap showed a positive trend with PC1 ( r = .3, p = .25) and a negative trend with PC3 ( r = −.34, p = .19). 4 Discussion 4.1 General patterns at the species, assemblage, and community level Our findings provide a broad picture of pelagic fish and jellyfish trophic structure across an urbanizing estuary.
a positive trendp = 0.265.2× alphagold
In contrast, interventions shorter than one year, while demonstrating a positive trend (OR = 1.42[0.77–2.62]), did not reach statistical significance ( p = 0.26) and exhibited moderate heterogeneity among studies (I2=40%).
a positive trendp = 0.275.4× alphagold
Regarding to OS analysis, absence of liver metastases confirmed to be associated with better outcomes ( p = 0.0002); conversely, “high” leptin/VAT ratio did not reached stastical significance, despite a positive trend toward association was still confirmed ( p = 0.27), considering the early follow-up evalutation (Table 2 ).
a positive trendp = 0.285.6× alphagold
When performing a simple mixed effects logistic regression model, the less finely ground, pelleted feed did not seem to significantly impact the odds of severe gastric lesions, however, there was a positive trend towards an effect (odds ratio (OR) (95% confidence interval (CI)) = 1.72 (0.64–4.63), p = 0.28).
a positive trendp = 0.285.6× alphagold
Although we found a positive trend, the relationship was not significant (logarithmic regression: R 2 = 0.22, F 1,6 = 1.45; p = 0.28) due to one outlying data point ( P. nyererei × A. calliptera , cross 7; the exclusion of this outlier resulted in a strong positive correlation: R 2 = 0.81, F 1,5 = 17.32; p = 0.014).