Barely Significant
← all phrases

“a numerical trend”

1,013 sentences · 1,013 papers · 1,817 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

It is important to note that while there appears to be a numerical trend suggesting a slightly elevated per‐eye risk in bilateral surgery compared with unilateral surgery, this meta‐analysis did not find sufficient evidence to conclude a statistically significant independent additional risk beyond simply having twice as many eyes at risk.
Although statistical analysis in each stimulus size did not reveal a significant difference between the sighting and the nonsighting eyes ( P > 0.05 across stimulus sizes), a numerical trend suggests a transition from the sighting eye dominance in the no-attention condition to attentional selected nonsighting eye dominance under the attention condition ( Fig. 2 H).
Although we could not give a definitive answer to that because there was no statistically significant AE differences between group 1 and group 2, group 1 showed a numerical trend towards fewer TEAEs, fewer dropout rates due to AEs, and fewer moderate to severe AEs, suggesting that 15 mg/day dose-titration might be preferable than alternate dose titration (group 2).
6 In contrast, FZOCUS‐1 suggested a numerical trend toward improved PFS with the combination therapy of fuzuloparib plus apatinib over fuzuloparib monotherapy in patients with HRP OC, extending the median PFS by 5.6 months (16.6 vs. 11.0 months), with an HR of 0.73 (95% CI, 0.45–1.19).
As can be seen in Fig 5B , participants indeed showed a numerical trend to switch faster in the formerly volatile versus formerly stable casino, a difference that turned out to be significant in the third (χ 2 = 4.551, p = .033) and fourth (χ 2 = 4.01, p = .045) trial after the first reward contingency switch.
Learning environment-specific learning rates.
PLoS Comput Biol · 2024 · PMC10990245
However, although we observed a numerical trend with less serious infections in tapering versus continuation of the initial treatment schedule (1.7/100 p-y versus 2.6/100 p-y), our study was not able to show a statistical difference.