Barely Significant
← all phrases

“a near-significant trend”

291 sentences · 291 papers · 463 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.07

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

The Q2 group did not show significant differences from the Q1 group in any of the models, while the Q4 group displayed a near-significant trend in the fully adjusted model (β = 0.021, 95% CI: −0.002 to 0.045, P = .071), though this did not reach statistical significance.
a near-significant trendp = 0.0711.4× alphagold
Long jump performance had been significantly related to nearly all other events, including the shot put (r = 0.558, p < 0.01), high jump (r = 0.789, p < 0.01), 110 m hurdles (r = 0.829, p < 0.01), discus throw (r = 0.580, p < 0.01), pole vault (r = 0.623, p < 0.01), and javelin throw (r = 0.385, p < 0.05), with a near-significant trend for the 1500 m run (r = 0.328, p = 0.071), reflecting the importance of lower-limb power and agility.
a near-significant trendp = 0.0721.4× alphagold
When grouping variants by functional consequence and burden testing for association with metabolic and cardiovascular phenotypes, cAMP LoF variants suggest a near-significant trend toward higher body mass index (BMI) (effect size in SD of phenotype (β): 0.22; confidence interval [CI] = −0.02, 0.46; p = 0.072), body fat percentage (β: 0.14; CI = −0.05, 0.33; p < 0.139), diastolic blood pressure (β: 0.34; CI = 0.09, 0.58; p = 0.007), and systolic blood pressure (β: 0.23; CI = 0.00, 0.46; p = 0.046) ( Fig. 6 , A and B ).
a near-significant trendP = 0.0751.5× alphagold
Logistic regression (Supplementary Table 6 ) analyses confirmed second-line treatment (OR = 9.745, P = 0.003) and impaired baseline ALBI (OR = 3.750, P = 0.048) as independent adverse prognostic factors, with ECOG-PS showing a near-significant trend ( P = 0.075).
a near-significant trendp = 0.0771.5× alphagold
near-significantp = 0.0771.5× alphagold
Comparing n-3 PUFA intake directly to urinary 8-iso-PGF 2α resulted in only a near-significant trend (p = 0.077; p = 0.0828 after adjusting for sex); a recent publication of findings from the larger LIPGENE cohort reported a similar near-significant trend [35] .