“a marginal trend”

Student GPAs showed a marginal trend toward improvement (coefficient: 0.15; 95% CI: −0.01 to 0.31, p = 0.07).

In patients with poorly differentiated tumors, the difference in OS between the low- and high-FSL score groups did not reach statistical significance (HR 1.42, 95% CI 0.92–2.20; P = 0.11), although a marginal trend was noted for RFS (HR 1.50, 95% CI 0.97–2.34; P = 0.07).

This analysis confirmed that both the left and right FFA regions of interest were sensitive to repetition [left: F (1, 15) = 16.71, p = 0.001; right: F (1, 15) = 24.78, p = 0.0001] and to the interaction between repetition and repetition probability [left: F (1, 15) = 6.93, p = 0.019; right: F (1, 15) = 5.38, p = 0.035], with a marginal trend for a main effect of repetition probability in the right FFA [ F (1, 15) = 3.79, p = 0.07].

When re-running the analysis at the stricter standard clinical cutoff (T-score ≥ 65), the difference in sleep problems between females with and without a PM did not reach statistical significance, though a marginal trend was observed [Fisher’s exact test p = 0.070; OR = 3.17, 95% CI (0.80, 15.05)].

A marginal trend correlation was also observed between the neural invasion and ALDH1 intensity of staining ( P =0.07).

Using the Fridericia formula, significant associations persisted for serum bicarbonate (OR: 0.92, p = 0.001) and blood pH (OR: 0.21, p = 0.03), while a marginal trend was observed for ischemic stroke (OR: 0.37, p = 0.07).

Although post-hoc comparisons did not yield statistically significant differences, a marginal trend was observed, with sunrise dottybacks choosing the orange ephemeral food more frequently than orchid dottybacks (estimate = 2.41, se = 1.11, p = 0.07; all other p s ≥ 0.13).

There was also a marginal trend toward an interaction in V3/Vp ( F (1,14) = 4.08, p < 0.07; all other F's < 1).

proliferatum (F) showed a marginal trend toward active zone preference, (Z = 1.79, p = 0.07, OR = 1.20).

Gasdermin D revealed only a marginal trend to predict POD (OR 1.50 [0.97–2.32], p = 0.07), which faded when adjusted for covariates in models 2 and 3.

Our results demonstrated that patients with LAA muscles undergoing SLNB had a similar median number of dissected lymph nodes (5 nodes in both groups), although the distribution showed a marginal trend toward fewer nodes in the LAA group ( p = 0.070).

Accuracy showed no main effect of semantic relationship or exposure duration ( F s < 1), but there was a marginal trend toward an interaction [ F (1, 29) = 3.53, p = .070, η p 2 = .108], driven by higher accuracy for the SR object at 500 ms and for the NR object at 2,000 ms, though neither of these were significantly different.

The effect of the condition showed a marginal trend ( B = 6.24, SE = 3.43, t = 1.82, p = 0.07).

There was a marginally significant interaction between handedness direction and handedness strength [ F (1,62) = 3.28; p = .07; η p 2 = 0.05], but since this was only a marginal trend, we did not examine it further.

In the subgroup analysis of patients with extended follow-up, sCRR duration of minimum 3 years showed a marginal trend (OR: 0.22, P -value = 0.07), while sCRR duration of at least 4 years (adjusted OR: 0.10, P -value = 0.005) was significantly associated with lower risk of severe kidney function decline ( Table 4 ), along with persistent HCQ use (adjusted OR: 0.07, P -value = 0.02).

Secondly, our findings show that displacement status did not significantly differentiate between mental health and resilience clusters, though a marginal trend was observed ( p = .07).

There was a marginal trend toward differences in Lactobacillus abundance in rectal feces between the following time points: FD3 vs FD21 ( P = 0.07), FD7 vs FD21 ( P = 0.07), and FD14 vs FD21 ( P = 0.10), although these differences did not reach statistical significance ( P > 0.05) ( Table 3 ).

A 3-level random-effects meta-analysis of 8 studies (13 effect sizes) assessing QOL using PDQ scales revealed a marginal trend toward improvement after telehealth interventions (SMD –0.42, 95% CI –0.88 to 0.03; P =.07).

On day 8, the control, IR + memantine, and IR + joint groups had significantly shorter times to first platform entry compared to the IR group ( p < 0.05), while the IR + HRW group showed a marginal trend ( p = 0.07, Figure 2 s).

reported a marginal trend toward recovery ( p = 0.07), suggesting potential for future improvements.

The interaction effect between schizotypy and enterotype approached statistical significance only in predicting SPQ paranoid ideation scores, with a marginal trend observed ( F 3,128 = 1.06, p = .070).

The H/L ratio, which did not differ between age groups, was higher in tourist-visited than control sites, with a marginal trend ( P = 0.071) towards a tourism by age interaction (Table 2 , Fig. 3 ).

With respect to sample size, the raw n specification showed a marginal trend, b ≈ 0.000, 95% CI [−0.000, 0.000], p = 0.072, explaining 2.07% of heterogeneity, whereas the log-transformed N was clearly nonsignificant ( p = 0.619).

The interaction between host‐plant species and assemblage connectivity showed a marginal trend ( t = 1.82, p = .072), and accordingly, there was a significant positive effect of connectivity for assemblages inhabiting C. spinosus ( t = 2.58, p = .012), but no significant effect on A. fasciculatum ( t < 0.01, p = .997).

Notably, the previously significant global strength difference between the clinical and subclinical groups became non-significant after covariate adjustment (S = 0.740, p = 0.386; GS clinical = 4.563, GS subclinical = 3.823), as did the difference between the subclinical and HC groups, which showed a marginal trend after adjustment (S = 1.099, p = 0.072; GS subclinical = 3.823, GS HC = 4.922).