“a marginal trend”

Control training showed a marginal trend to improve the limb-kinetic SARA subscore ( P = 0.059) and total SARA score ( P = 0.068).

The percentage of fibers with internal nuclei was also 27% lower in the RFAT group than in the FAT control group, but this difference only showed a marginal trend that did not reach the level of statistical significance ( p = 0.059).

Multiple linear regression revealed that while CCT showed a marginal trend toward affecting PNCT measurements after controlling for GAT (P = 0.059), the effect size was clinically negligible (β = 0.008 mmHg per 1 μm increase in CCT).

This pattern was consistent in both Chesapeake ( P = .041) and Delaware Bays ( P = .005), was strongest during summer ( P = .0047), and showed only a marginal trend in spring ( P = .059).

Moreover, a marginal trend towards significance was observed for increased CRP in the MRMP group (60.4% vs. 44.7%, P =0.059).

The pooled analysis indicated a marginal trend favoring robotic-assisted (RA) surgery in fluoroscopy time (SMD −0.56; 95% CI −1.15–0.03; p = 0.06), which became significant after excluding Le et al., Lonjon et al., or Zhang et al., suggesting RA may improve intraoperative efficiency despite high heterogeneity [ 21 ].

We observed a marginal trend suggesting that transgender young adults ( N =9; 34.6%) were less likely to be employed than YMSM ( N =68; 55.3%) peers (odds ratio [OR]=0.43, p =0.06).

Within infected hydras, budding rate was lowest in Class D (≥ 30 ciliates), which performed significantly worse than Class B (Figure 4C ; Poisson GLMM; IRR = 0.57, 95% CI [0.39–0.83], p < 0.001), Class C (Figure 4C ; Poisson GLMM; IRR = 0.66, 95% CI [0.44–0.98], p = 0.01), and Class 0 (Figure 4C ; Poisson GLMM; IRR = 0.67, 95% CI [0.44–1.03], p = 0.02), and showed a marginal trend toward lower budding than Class A (Figure 4C ; Poisson GLMM; IRR = 0.74, 95% CI [0.50–1.09], p = 0.06).

The effect was consistent when pooling together trials from both categories (All Go, OR = 1.33, 95% CI = [1.15, 1.54], p = 8.3E −5 , one‐sided logistic regression), with a marginal trend of stronger effect for high‐value probe choices (OR = 1.11, 95% CI = [0.99, 1.23], p = .06, two‐sided logistic regression).

However, there is a marginal trend of statistical significance for strain factor (F (1, 47) = 3.705, p = 0.06).

When analyzed by BAR tertiles, patients in the highest tertile (T3: 4.255–10) exhibited a more pronounced reduction in MoCA scores (β = −0.44, 95% CI: −0.81 to −0.07, p = 0.019) compared to the lowest tertile (T1: 1.489–3.265), while the middle tertile (T2: 3.265–4.255) showed a marginal trend ( β = −0.34, 95% CI: −0.68 to 0.01, p = 0.06).

Omega-3 FA supplementation resulted in a numerical reudction in the fibrotic area, exhibiting a marginal trend toward statistical significance ( p = 0.06). 2.2.

Two particular differences found in the supplementary analysis were (1) once SRS was included in the model, stress MBF and MPR showed a marginal trend towards significance in contrast with the global analysis ( p = .06 and p = .07, respectively), and (2) rest MBF demonstrated a significant effect in Model 1 that included MPR as the perfusion parameter.

While mindfulness skills showed a marginal trend toward improvement ( P = .06), it did not reach statistical significance.

5 a), whereas the CIRCLE condition showed only a marginal trend ( P = 0.06, Unc, around 600 ms post-onset; Fig. 5 b).

10 min) showed a marginal trend for CVAEs ( p = 0.06) [ 23 ].

Although there was a marginal trend at baseline ( p = 0.060), this suggests that static ALPS is not a reliable predictor of symptom severity.

Regarding, depression symptoms, a marginal trend towards significance was found in those volunteers that received a LF diet (β = 0.42, p = 0.06). 4.

Only the relative thoracoabdominal aortic level of IL-10 showed a marginal trend towards an inverse correlation with atherosclerosis in ApoE-deficient mice (plasma IL-10 level: Spearman’s r = −0.47, p = 0.06) ( Figure S3, panels (b) and (c) ).

There was a marginal trend toward an increase in oral antimicrobials as measured by the dDOT/tDOT metric (0.32 vs. 0.34, p = 0.06).

There was a marginal trend toward lower average postoperative pain scores reported by the intervention group (control 3.6/10, SD 1.6; intervention 3.0/10, SD = 1.8; P = 0.06).

In contrast, precuneus volumes were not significantly related to neurological status (Figure 1C ), although the right hemisphere showed a marginal trend toward reduced volume among individuals with dementia (β = –2.81e‐04, p = 0.060) (Figure 1D ). 3.2.

Omentectomy showed a marginal trend toward improved survival (HR = 0.6, 95% CI 0.4–1.0, p = 0.06), whereas hysterectomy, lymphadenectomy, and adjuvant chemotherapy were not significantly associated with OS in the univariate model.

A similar regression predicting intention to drink coffee revealed a marginal trend for the main effect of condition (β = -0.16, t = -1.91, p = 0.06, r p = -0.16) with participants in the experimental condition reporting less desire for coffee, no significant effect of sensation seeking (β = 0.02, t = 0.21, p = 0.83, r p = 0.02) and no significant interaction (β = -0.02, t = -0.22, p = 0.83, r p = -0.02).

Specifically, chest X‐ray use was 20% lower in the RSV‐LRTI group (IRR = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.76–0.85; p < 0.001), while respiratory‐related hospitalizations showed a marginal trend (IRR = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.77–1.00; p = 0.06). 4.