Barely Significant
← all phrases

“a clear trend”

19,461 sentences · 19,461 papers · 31,348 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p<0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

a clear trendP < 0.051.0× alphagold
The OPLS-DA score plot showed a clear trend towards separation between the two groups, and the currently established discriminant model with R2Y cum = 0.366 ( P < 0.05) and Q2 cum = 0.129 ( P < 0.05) allowed for a valid distinction between the two samples, indicating that there were indeed metabolic differences between the case and control groups.
a clear trendp = 0.05051.0× alphagold
In the CeL, a clear trend ( p = 0.0505, one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s posthoc tests) for increased GFAP (+) signals at chronic SNL compared to acute SNL was observed, but there were no statistically significant differences between the three groups ( Figure 1C , sham = 10, SNL 1w = 10, SNL 4w = 10 total GFAP (+) sample areas pe
a clear trendP = 0.0511.0× alphagold
Western analysis of hippocampal K48-linked polyubiquitinated proteins, generally targeted for proteasomal degradation, showed a clear trend of increased levels in PA28αOE (Fig. 4 b and Additional file 13 ; P = 0.051), indicating reduced 26S proteasome activity and in line with PA28α overexpression being unable to activate proteasome activity. 20S proteasome capacity was not induced in PA28αOE hippocampi (Fig. 4 c and Additional file 10 ) and hippocampal levels of proteasome related markers Rpt2 (19S subunit), β5 (20S) and β5i (20Si) did not differ between WT and PA28αOE (Fig. 4 d and Additional file 13 ), while PA28α overexpression in PA28αOE hippocampi was verified (Fig. 4 d).
a clear trendp=0.0511.0× alphagold
In the subgroup of patients that came from LAMA or LABA monotherapy, blood eosinophil count showed a clear trend (p=0.051) of comparative effectiveness based on the number of SABA inhalers used in favor of extrafine BDP/FF with increasing eosinophil count.
a clear trendp = 0.0511.0× alphagold
Univariate analyses confirmed the influence of conformity for two of the three aspects of coherence, F (1,87) = 5.20, p = 0.002, η 2 = 0.056 for temporal coherence, F (1,87) = 10.29, p < 0.001, η 2 = 0.106 for causal-motivational coherence, and a clear trend for thematic coherence, F (1,87) = 3.87, p = 0.051, η 2 = 0.043.