Excerpts

There was a highly significant positive correlation between hepatic cellular infiltrates and the copy number of dnTGFβRII transgene (r = 0.9342, p<0.0001), indicating that abrogation of TGFβ signaling by higher copy number of dnTGFβRII contributes to the emergence of T cell lymphoma-like T cell infiltration.

Number of medication was not associated to shift work group as long as age was introduced as a covariate, which was highly significant related to older age ( p < 0.0001).

1A and B , a highly significant effect (P<0.0001) of GOSS on cell viability was found in MM-231 and MM-468 cells at different concentrations of the compound (6.3–100 and 10–50 μM in MM-231 and MM-468, respectively).

The difference in prevalence among the different age-classes was highly significant (p < 0.0001).

Figure 4 shows a bar graph of the average A , ε m a x , ε ∞ , τ r of the 4 cell lines and indicates the level of significance: where p > 0.05 is not significant (ns), 0.01 < p < 0.05 is significant (*), 0.001 < p < 0.01 is very significant (**), 0.0001 < p < 0.001 is extremely significant (***) and p < 0.0001 is extremely significant (****), raw values can be found in Table S1 .

There were fewer tolerant genera of yeast in samples that were incubated at 30 °C when the ethanol concentration was raised from 8 to 16%. Figure 12a shows the results of a repeated measures one-way ANOVA with a Geisser-Greenhouse’s epsilon correction, which showed a significant change (P = 0.0260) of the number of tolerant yeasts to ethanol concentrations between genera of yeasts (columns) and a highly significant difference (P < 0.0001) between ethanol concentrations (rows).

There was a markedly significant difference in the median PCT level between bacteria-infected subgroup A (0.24 ng/mL) and TF subgroup A (0.05 ng/mL) ( p < 0.0001) ( Figure 2(a) ).

1 ), being the difference with the WT variability highly significant (Wilcoxon signed rank test V = 12246, P < 0.0001).

There is a highly significant difference between B10-injected and PBS-injected mice in two-way ANOVA (F = 50.32, P<0.0001).

A highly significant decrease ( P = 0.0001) in RD was noted from baseline to 6 months.

However, these results indicate a highly significant ( P < 0.0001) almost tenfold increase in the number of cells lacking MYO6 with an abnormal TBC structure, visualized by F-actin staining.

There was a highly significant correlation between the hypoxia gene expression score and fetal blood lactate concentrations at delivery (Figure 4 ; r = 0.81, P <0.0001).

Additionally, this cluster contained a highly significant 2.8-fold enrichment of immunity proteins (p < 0.0001), including proteins involved in the regulation of complement activation (p = 0.034).

Differences within groups were marginally significant or non‐significant, while the difference among groups was highly significant ( P < 0.0001).

Although statistically, the correlation between phenotypic and genotypic detection of CRE was highly significant ( P <0.0001), false-positive and false-negative phenotypic results may coexist, which may alter the management of CRE patients.

T category The statistical comparison of the frequency of superficial tumours (Tis, Ta and T1) and muscle invasive tumours (≥ T2) in the Hamburg study population with the data of the RKI showed a highly significant increase ( P < 0.0001) in the incidence of muscle invasive tumours in SCI patients (Fig. 4 ).

One-way ANOVA ( Tables S1 and S3 ) further indicated that the overall model was highly significant ( p < 0.0001), with experimental data closely fitting the predictive model.

The correlations between ALC and a CD4 cell count, and between TLC and a CD4 cell count were highly significant (spearman correlation coefficients of r=0.5604, P <0.0001 and 0.3497, P <0.001 respectively).

The lactation number was highly significant ( p < 0.0001) when comparing LCS groups, as well as the age of the animals ( p < 0.0001).

These data indicate overall higher sST2 concentrations in males than females, which is highly significant after adjusting for age (effect estimate 49% lower in women [95% CI 42% to 55%], p<0.0001) ( Table 1 ).

There was a strong trend (p < .0001) in the relationship between number of prescription medications used and responsiveness to DTC advertisements.

As there were highly significant differences ( P < 0.0001) in all assembled mitogenomes, we fit estimated copy numbers against chromosome lengths using linear regressions.

And FAM151A and MC1R showed highly significant difference between CRC and normal samples ( P < 0.0001).

There was a highly significant change in ACTH levels observed in the M, ELb, Esch, and ELbEsch groups ( p < 0.0001), and a pronounced difference was seen in the EThy group ( p < 0.001), as shown in Figure 3 c.

Oral cavity and salivary gland cancer showed a positive trend in the treatment rates (oral cavity: RR: 1.1, CI: 1.06–1.11, p < 0.0001; salivary glands: RR 1.1, CI: 1.03–1.10, p = 0.0005).