In both cases, there was a highly significant (p < 0.0001) negative correlation between FEV 1 (% pred.) and LCI.
Excerpts
Our model results (see Methods for details) show that the differences between chimpanzees from Ngogo and Issa were highly significant in the δ 13 C values ( χ 2 = 61.45, df = 1, p < 0.0001) and the δ 15 N values ( χ 2 = 80.67, df = 1, p < 0.0001), with Issa chimpanzees being less depleted in 13 C, and much lower in 15 N (Fig. 2c , Table 1 ).
coli ATCC 25922; the bacterial LOD was 10 2 –10 3 CFU/mL, with highly significant signal differences ( p < 0.0001).
Among the tested factors, SLR showed to be an influential variable , exhibiting extremely significant p-values (p < 0.0001) across nearly all responses (except for protein specific energy demand, PSED; and less influential for total yield, TY).
A two-sample t test showed a highly significant difference between the 10 Little Dolphins children with CIs and the 44 children with CIs from the two previous studies ( t = 5.812, p < .0001).
The enrichment was highly significant compared to random control regions ( P = 0.0001) and decreased with distance from the genetic variants ( Supplementary Dataset S4 ).
The difference in heme levels between the Sham group and the ischemic core region was highly significant (P < 0.0001) ( Fig. 2 d).
General combining ability (GCA) and specific combining ability (SCA) effects were highly significant ( P < 0.0001) for all traits.
As shown in Figure 4 , the diagnostic power of C6Ma1 and C6Ma3 was highly significant with an AUROC of 0.90 ( P < .0001) and of 0.87 ( P < .0001), respectively when comparing healthy control to patients with cancer.
Statistical analysis was conducted, where the production levels of investigated phenolic compounds in rol A transgenic plants exhibited an extremely significant difference ( p < 0.0001) when compared to the wild type A. carvifolia plants ( Table 2 ). 3.5.
Notably, there was a highly significant reduction ( p < 0.0001) at concentrations of 400 μg/ml and above, reaching maximum viability reduction after 5 min of laser irradiation (Fig. 7 A–D).
The difference in RWL between the 2 groups was highly significant (T-test: p<0.0001).
Given the large sample size and the highly significant X2 of the maximum likelihood ratio (p < 0.0001), this model was judged to have adequate fit for determining association.
P ‐value was reported as * p < 0.05 considered statistically significant, ** p < 0.01 considered highly significant, and *** p < 0.0001 very highly significant.
There is a highly significant correlation (P<0.0001) between the reduced number of DCs and delay in treatment initiation.
The results clearly demonstrate highly significant CD4 + and CD8 + T cell allogeneic immunization in partners practising unprotected homosexual (p<0.0001 and p = 0.001) or heterosexual (p = 0.001 and p<0.0001) intercourse, respectively.
Overdose recovery time is highly significant ( P < 0.0001) between the Naloximeter and self-recovery ( N = 3 and 4; recovery times = 4.5 ± 0.3 and 23 ± 4 min, respectively).
In this case, the preregistered ANOVA confirmed that there was a highly significant effect of depth order, F (1, 18) = 25.1, p < 0.0001, ges = 0.53.
A r -value of 0.97 shows very strong correlation between CFB and GCB, which was statistically highly significant ( P <0.0001).
*, p < 0.05 (significant); **, p < 0.01 (very significant); ***, p < 0.001 (highly significant); ****, p < 0.0001 (extremely significant); and ns, p > 0.05 (not significant). 3.
The positive correlation between tea consumption and total flavonoids was highly significant, with an R2 = 0.7968 ( p < 0.0001).
Among the 30 older participants there were highly significant correlations between the right precuneus and the CVLT short and long delay free and cued recall scores (SDFR r = 0.636, p < .0001; SDCR r = 0.593, p < .001; LDFR r = 0.551, p < .005; LDCR r = 0.634, p < .0001), and with the CVLT Learning Slope (LS) (r = 0.67, p < .0001).
According to the statistical analysis, the concentration of DBA (X 3 ) had a highly significant effect ( P < 0.0001) on the SPF and sunscreen efficacy of the fabricated oleogels (Fig. 6 C & F).
For both Para and non-disabled datasets, highly significant correlations were found for all peak and average HHD values (all above r = 0.95, p < 0.0001), and many of the strength measures were significantly correlated (r > 0.7, p < 0.01), except for hip external rotation.
focused attention was highly significant for the high performing older adults (t(10)=6.78, p<0.0001) but only trended towards significance for the low performers (t(10)=2.05, p=0.07).