All among-gyre pairwise F ST values based on mtCOII were highly significant, irrespective of sampling year ( P < 0.0001; S3 Table ), with values ranging up to 0.407.
Excerpts
Endpoint fluorescence quantification confirmed highly significant signals at concentrations of 10 6 to 10 3 copies/μL ( p < 0.0001) and statistically significant increases at 10 2 to 10 1 copies/μL compared with controls ( p < 0.01) (Fig. 5 G).
Lens transmission and pupil responses to blue (470 nm) light Lens transmission of blue light in relation to age Our results revealed a highly significant linear decrease in blue (a peak at 480 nm) light transmission through the lens with increasing age (r = −0.91, p < 0.0001, transmission = 1.08–(0.01 * age), see Figure 4 ).
All pre- and post-test comparisons were highly significant by t -test ( p < 0.0001).
Geographical Differences in Skull Shape, Diversity and Size Highly significant shape differences ( p < 0.0001) were detected among all areas, except between Arctic localities (High Arctic vs.
GDP was a highly significant linear predictor of a diagnosis of PCP (p<0.0001).
Highly significant differences ( P <0.0001) were observed among participants across the different AIP risk levels in terms of age, gender, race, education level, marital status, poverty-to-income ratio, 12-month average daily alcohol consumption, depression, LE8 score, CVH level, health behaviors score, and health factors score.
An unpaired t-test revealed a highly significant difference in TL between the two groups ( t 31 = 6.83, p <0.0001, Figs. 1 and 2 ).
GLI1 shows a clear trend with all three tested proteins: a stronger staining of GLI1 corresponds to a stronger staining of GLI3 ( p < 0.0001), KRT16 ( p < 0.0001), and S100A7 ( p < 0.0001) proteins.
The four distance interims also demonstrated a highly significant difference ( p < 0.0001) when compared to one another.
bassiana ARSEF 8465 recorded against each tested concentration showed highly significant differences ( F = 6.33; p = 0.0001) as shown in Table 3 .
We found a highly significant statistical difference ( P < 0.0001) in the invasiveness index between them.
The effect is highly significant (p<0.0001) for all hemispheres.
One-way ANOVA confirmed these differences were highly significant (F = 76.79, p < 0.0001).
ANOVA demonstrates all three models were found to be highly significant ( p < 0.0001), with large F-values of 40.86, 79.51, and 165.77 for 7 days, 28 days, and 91 days, respectively, indicating strong correlations between the selected input factors and the responses.
The opposite effect was observed in Ségou Region, where peak incidence at those HFs where IRS was withdrawn after the 2016 campaign (n = 19) increased by an average of 106% (CI 95 63–150%) from year to year, also a highly significant difference-in-differences compared to the standard no-IRS HFs (p < 0.0001) (Fig. 3 ).
The model showed that chromosome identity had a highly significant effect on pairing success ( P < 0.0001), indicating consistent interchromosomal differences in pairing likelihood.
Seedling response to six Pst races Seedling responses showed highly significant differences ( P < 0.0001) among accessions within each race.
This decrease in radiation by 44% is statistically extremely significant at P < .0001.
Results In 53 studies of dystonia phenotypes, the proportion of men showed a highly significant negative association with mean age of onset ( p < 0.0001, pseudo- R 2 = 59.6%), with increasing female predominance from 40 years of age.
A highly significant interaction between geometry and CCF inclusion was also identified ( p < 0.0001), demonstrating that the influence of fibre reinforcement on void formation differs according to geometric complexity.
The generated Moran's I values (Table 2 ) are highly significant ( p value < 0.0001) and indicate a quite strong degree of positive spatial autocorrelation; regions with similar rates of COVID-19 deaths tend to be located next to each other (i.e. they form spatial clusters).
Results There was a highly significant fall in mean FeNO of 51.7% over 2 weeks ( p < 0.0001) accompanied by significant improvements in mean FEV 1 , ACQ6 and ASX scores.
The difference in age structure among the groups as reported by the authors in their Table 1 is, in fact, highly significant ( χ 2 =374.6; P <0.0001).
Results: The percentage of overweight males was 43.2% as against 22% females, the figure for males being highly significant (p<0.0001).