All primary breast cancers showed a highly significant difference ( P <0.0001) in FI compared to the surrounding normal mammary tissue ( Figure 1 ).
Excerpts
However, there is a highly significant correlation between the average length of isotigs and percent BLAST hits (e.g. hits against ara , P < 0 . 0001, Table 4 ), and also between the total sequence length of each isotig group with the proportion of BLAST hits (e.g. hits against ara , P = 0 . 003).
Comparison of best-fit regression lines by sum-of-squares F -test showed that the increases in MBP and SBP were highly significant ( p < 0.0001 for both) and the increase in DBP was also significant ( p = 0.0056).
The sexual dimorphism was highly significant in this genetically diverse population (Sex: p < 0.0001, Fig. 1D , results from complete linear model found in Table S1 ) and the difference in container types contributed no significant effect on survival (Container*Sex: p = 0.12, results from complete linear model found in Table S1 ).
In multivariate analysis, the model was highly significant for OS ( p < 0.0001), and T stage ( p = 0.002) and ECOG performance status ( p < 0.001) arose as independent predictors, while BED 10 ≥ 132 Gy was associated with better LPFS ( p < 0.0001).
The age difference between the two scan angle groups was highly significant (Mann–Whitney U test, p < 0.0001).
A highly significant positive correlation was evident between TSH and creatinine (r=0.72, p <0.0001).
On the other hand, assessment of the association between the different pathobiological factors showed a highly significant association of cyclin E with p21 expression ( P <0.0001) and with p53 ( P =0.014).
Clinical Pharmacology disease management patient‐generated online data Pharmacometrics Psychopharmacology For major depression, the same relationship was even more pronounced, with an average loss of 0.4 rating points out of 10 per decade since the FDA approval (corresponding to a Pearson's R of between −0.56), highly significant for all drugs with at least five reviews ( P ≤ 0.0001), at least 10 reviews ( P ≤ 0.0001), or at least 20 reviews ( P = 0.0002) (Table 2 ).
The ANOVA results showed a highly significant difference between the groups (F = 2820, P < 0.0001) and an R2 value of 0.9991, indicating that 99.91% of the between-group differences could be explained by changes in the relative expression of NME4.
The F -ratio of 10.13 is highly significant ( p < 0.0001) which indicates that the whole model comprising three predictors/parameters does provide a significantly better fit to the data than simply the mean.
Analysis of these 10 significant genes as a single metric by two-way ANOVA proves highly significant (p<0.0001) for islet quality, and together have a predictive accuracy for reversal of diabetes of 86% (ROC analysis; Area Under the Curve = 0.8640 ± 0.0285).
The ANOVA results for the set (i) showed highly significant and statistically greater Ks in the set of 26 mitogenomes: Ks = 1.618 ± 0.019, Ka = 0.384 ± 0.019 ( n = 325), F = 1949.2, d.f. = 1; 648, p < 0.0001 (effective hypothesis decomposition).
The difference between the two groups is extremely significant ( P <0.0001).
At test re-test, Cronbach’s alpha was 0.914, while the intra class correlation was 0.9160 (95% confidence interval 0.941–0.975), which is a highly significant correlation ( p < 0.0001).
did not achieve significanceP < 0.0001
At the L3 level, sex ( P = 0.081) and HCT‐CI ( P = 0.225) did not achieve significance, while age ( P < 0.0001), BMI ( P < 0.0001), and DRI ( P = 0.019) performed like their counterparts at the T4 level.
The differences between leaf and needling parameters among F 1 individuals were all extremely significant ( p < 0.0001).
Similar male preponderance was found in other comparable studies.[ 15 18 20 ] In some cases, although there was a female preponderance in others.[ 17 ] The higher male preponderance is not biological but could be due to environmental and lifestyle factors such as higher occupational exposure towards loud noise, greater prevalence of tobacco, and alcohol abuse and their higher probabilities of visiting the hospital than women.[ 21 ] An intragroup analysis revealed that following treatment, the reduction in mean THI score, and mean TFI score from baseline was extremely significant in each group at 4 weeks, 8 weeks, and 12 weeks ( P < 0.0001).
After adjusting for potential confounders (multivariable Poisson regression analysis), the positive correlation between WDD and FGPD remained highly significant, β:0.15(95%CI 0.13–0.16, P < 0.0001), Furthermore, the negative correlation between WDD and attaining tertiary education,β:0.05(95% CI:-0.095- -0.0005) remained significant after running a multivariable analysis (Table 2 ).
The content of each individual element, except Fe, showed highly significant differences between the inner structure and the surface (results from Wilcoxon‐test: p < .0001*, for p ‐values see Table A1 ).
Consequently, the Group × Task × Trait interaction remained highly significant (β = 0.89, SE = 0.19, Z = 4.59, p < 0.0001).
The full set of environmental variables explains 28.3% of the variation in the species abundances, which is highly significant at P <0.0001 according to a permutation test [40] .
Notably, larvae treated with 2.4 mg/mL VitB3 exhibited the most pronounced reduction in fluorescence intensity, with statistical analysis confirming a highly significant difference compared to the untreated control group (P<0.0001; Figure 1B ).
qRT-PCR again showed a reduction in PDS mRNA levels in plants infected with BSMV-BdPDS compared to BSMV-GFP 375 , the difference being highly significant ( p < 0.0001) (Figure 5B ).
Results All validation comparisons showed a highly significant correlation (P < 0.0001) with strong correlation was observed between cores for the majority of multiplex stains.