Excerpts

RR of successful eradication with TT was 1.27 (95% CI: 1.14–1.41), with a highly significant p -value ( p < 0.0001).

PF showed a trend toward increased IL‐1β (Figure 5K ), whereas SEMA induced a robust increase in IL‐6 ( p < 0.0001; Figure 5L ) and elevated TNF‐α compared to control ( p < 0.0001), though levels were significantly lower than in PF ( p < 0.0001).

Notably, a pronounced and highly significant difference was observed in SEP thresholds (F = 90.39, p < 0.0001, Figure 3(b) ).

The lack of a significant interaction between the stress and IMI treatment was observed in the anterodorsal part of the medial amygdaloid nucleus (MeAD) [interaction, F (2, 36) = 1.40; ns], while the treatment factor was highly significant [treatment factor, F (1, 36) = 24.20; p < 0.0001] and the impact of stress was also statistically significant [stress factor, F (2, 36) = 3.75; p < 0.05].

The sensitivity model showed only a minimal reduction in explanatory performance compared with the main model, with an R 2 of 0.721 and an adjusted R 2 of 0.716; the overall model remained highly significant (F = 135.38; p < 0.0001) ( Tables S8–S10 ).

Differences between two groups were considered statistically significant when the P -value was < 0.05, highly significant at P < 0.01, and extremely significant at P < 0.0001.

The red line indicates the best linear fit for the two estimates with the resulting correlation being highly significant (R 2 = 0.8, p<0.0001).

The results are highly significant (p<0.0001, Table 2 ), and indicate that MYC IHC can identify a set of tumors with transcriptional profiles resembling those previously categorized as mBL.

At 38 days, when the first animal required euthanasia because of tumor size, tumors were 1,764 ± 1,526 mm 3 in the CA9 group and 126 ± 130 mm 3 in the control group ( Figure 5B ); differences in tumor growth were highly significant ( P <0.0001, twoway repeated measure analysis of variance with the Geisser-Greenhouse correction).

The Kruskal-Wallis test indicates a highly significant statistical difference between IUCN conservation statuses across the different local status classes (p-value < 0.0001).

However, patients with a high FRET efficiency (Fig 4 B) had considerably better survival (highly significant P < .0001) in first-line treatments compared with low FRET patients (median 50% survival still undefined after 50 months for high FRET v 11 months for low FRET patients).

With a confidence value of α = 0.05, values p > 0.05 were considered statistically not significant (ns); those between 0.01 < p < 0.05 were considered significant (*); 0.001 < p < 0.01 were very significant (**); 0.0001 < p < 0.001 were extremely significant (***) as well as those p < 0.0001 (****). t-test was used to assess statistical differences between two sample means (two-tailed paired or unpaired, when appropriate).

In both cases, the differences between the genotypes are highly significant (accelerated: P <0.0001; rocking: P <0.0001, two-way ANOVA).

We found a highly significant correlation between fold changes in insolubility measured by iTRAQ in both replicate analyses of fem-1(−) animals ( r = 0.8, p <0.0001).

Although the interaction was not significant, post hoc simple effect analyses confirmed that the aforementioned trend was highly significant in prefrontal cells (simple effect of cycle, F 3, 2244 = 11.3, P < 10 −4 ), with inferior parietal cells showing a similar but more moderate trend ( F 3, 2244 = 3.32, P = 0.02).

Comparisons to controls There were highly significant differences on the task for the ability to correctly identify the original pictures (F(1,301) = 124.4, P <0.0001) and the ability to identify the closely similar pictures (F(1,301) = 68.4, P <0.0001).

No significant differences in the prognostic value are noted between iPET-2 and i-PET-4 with both showing highly significant differences in EFS between the CMR and nCMR patients ( P -value < 0.0001): patients with iPET-2-CMR and iPET-2-nCMR had 3-y-EFS’s of 93.1% and 45.5%, respectively while the respective values for patients with iPET-4-CMR and iPET-4-nCMR were 89.5 and 39.4%.

Differences were considered significant at various p -values: p > 0.050 was considered non-significant, p < 0.050 (*) was significant, p < 0.010 (**) was very significant, p < 0.001 (***) was highly significant and p < 0.0001 (****) was extremely significant. 5.

For all three emotions, the effect was highly significant ( p < 0.0001).

1 ), and the correlation between total-body creatine pool size measured with the LC-MS/MS method or the IRMS method was highly significant ( r all rats = 0.96; r all rats treatment adjusted = 0.86, data not shown; P <0.0001).

Both fungal strains (S2 and S3) caused a highly significant mortality to the ants when applied at high doses in the challenge ( Fig. 1 and Table 1 ; C-C vs C-S2, early challenge: d.f. = 3.9, P <0.0001, late challenge: d.f. = 3.3, P <0.001; C-C vs C-S3, early challenge: d.f. = 5.1, P <0.00001, late challenge: d.f. = 4.1, P <0.0001).

Combined correlation analyses using all protein analytes resulted in a highly significant correlation ( P < 0.0001) between DISSECT-flow and imaging data, and between DISSECT-flow and immunoblotting data.

Fer-1 demonstrated a marked restoration of cell viability with a highly significant statistical difference (F(3,8) = 59.18, p < 0.0001; Figure 2 D).

Overall Survival Statistical analysis indicates margins ( p = 0.002) ( Figure 1 ) and grading ( p = 0.0479) ( Figure 2 ) are a risk factor on overall survival (OS) and the appearance of metastases is a highly significant Factor ( p < 0.0001) ( Figure 3 ) ( Table 3 ).

Statistical analysis showed a near-perfect agreement between the two methods, with a Cohen’s Kappa coefficient of 0.93 and a highly significant association by Fisher’s exact test (p < 0.0001).