The fat-graft group also showed highly significant differences when compared with the groups submitted to the sternocleidomastoid muscle flap ( p = 0.0001) and the platelet-rich fibrin gel techniques ( p = 0.016).
Excerpts
These departures from the expected numbers of papers are statistically highly significant (p << 0.01%), based on a Poisson distribution with one degree of freedom.
group II (0.972±0.505 ng/ml), and the differences were highly significant (p<0.0001).
The marginal treatment effect was highly significant for penicillins and macrolides (−3·916 [95% CI −5·202 to −2·636]; p<0·0001), but was not significant for the other antibiotics (−0·308 [–0·773 to 0·156]; p=0·194).
On the contrary, in WB-irradiated mice, the average percentage of apoptosis was 14.5% ± 0.76, a highly significant value compared to the unirradiated group ( p < 0.0001; Figure 7 a–e).
In all cases, differences were highly significant ( p < 1 × 10 −4 ): A . bandense , p = 4.76 × 10 −7 ; D . pealeii , p = 2.38 × 10 −5 ; E . berryi , p = 1.37 × 10 −5 ; I . argentinus , p = 2.13 × 10 −6 ; I . illecebrosus , p = 2.77 × 10 −5 ; O . bimaculoides , p = 2.06 × 10 −8 ; S . officinalis , p = 1.06 × 10 −6 ; and A . bandense juvenile skin swabs, p = 4.77 × 10 −49 .
Despite the different set of antibodies employed and potential batch effects, we observed a highly significant correlation between results obtained with the two methodologies (p < 0.0001, r 2 = 0.3).
Indeed, of the 250 males captured in the study, 58 were seropositive (23.2%) compared to 22 of 249 (8.8%) females, which is highly significant ( χ 2 = 13.80, 1 df, p <10 −4 ).
Figure 2a , depicts a marked difference in the diestrus phase duration within the DMPA-treated group before and after administration, showing a highly significant difference ( p <0.0001).
The mean of difference between two group was statistically highly significant ( P <0.0001) 4 th weeks onwards.
This difference was highly significant( p < 0.0001) [ 4 ].
Specifically, rmpA , rmpA2 , and iucA showed the strongest associations, with absolute differences in reporting frequency exceeding 20 percentage points and highly significant statistical support ( p < 0.0001 for all comparisons).
Each WHtR cutoff was a highly significant predictor ( P < 0.0001) with the inclusion of constructs for race, smoking, age, and sex.
Correlations between the CRPT 1 color/risk and CRPT 1-2 scores were highly significant (r color1-score1 = 0.835 and r color1-score2 = 0.832, p < 0.0001).
did not reach statistical significanceP < 0.0001
While differences in individual proteins did not reach statistical significance, overall, a greater number of proteins were elevated in the higher diversity group relative to the lower diversity group (Fisher’s exact test, P < 0.0001).
A one-way ANOVA demonstrated a highly significant difference in ALP levels across the four clinical severity grades (F = 399.79, p < 0.0001) (Table 1 ).
The breadth of the responses to the 11 epitopes showed highly significant correlations with both lower pVLs ( P < 1 × 10 −4 ; r = −0.4909) and higher CD4 counts ( P < 1 × 10 −4 ; r = 0.4542) in these Japanese individuals ( Fig. 8B ).
Cochran’s Q-test for heterogeneity is highly significant ( P < .0001) indicating substantial heterogeneity among the included studies ( Figure 1 ).
In the already cited study on compliance to SCIT, SLIT, and LNIT in children, data on SLIT concerned 806 patients, 173 of whom (21.4%) were noncompliant, with a highly significant difference (p < 0.0001) for a better compliance in hospital setting (90.5%) compared to private office setting (61.2%); the most common reason of withdrawal was the cost of treatment, reported globally in 36.4% of cases, followed by inconvenience, feeling of inefficacy, and side effects ( Pajno et al 2005 ).
There was a highly significant relationship of each morphometric variable with FL ( R 2 = 0.65–0.97 , p < 0.0001).
Nevertheless, ANOVA test indicated a highly significant difference among all tumor types and normal thyroid tissue for each marker (p<0.0001).
In addition, GRA35 DNA/mRNA prime–boost regimens resulted in a highly significant reduction in brain cyst numbers ( p < 0.0001) compared with the control group.
The results showed a highly significant correlation between meniscal injuries on MRI and intraoperative findings ( p < 0.0001).
Data from both laboratories have demonstrated a strong ability to discriminate between positive and negative samples, as indicated by a highly significant p < 0.0001 (Figure 2F ).
The NRI was highly significant ( P = .0001) for the ADNI cohort but was not significant ( P = .09) for the Bryan-ADRC cohort ( Table 2 ).