Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

highly significantP <0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The likelihood of undergoing resection has been shown to decrease with increasing age, with patients of age group 65–69 years having a 71% resection rate compared with 69% for those aged 70–74 years, 62% for those aged 80–84 years, 46% for those aged 80–84 years, and 31% for those aged 85 years and older, which was highly significant ( P <0.0001) even after adjusting for confounding factors. 3 This same trend was repeated almost identically for receipt of RT within 3 months of diagnosis or receipt of chemotherapy within 3 months of diagnosis, when analyzed according to increasing age, in the same US population-based report, 3 a
highly significantp = 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
All three analyses showed highly significant interactions between PST and light ( p = 0.0001, p = 0.0002, p = 0.0009, for PST content, production, and C fraction, respectively), a significant interaction between lytic toxicity and whether the strains contained PST ( p = 0.0157 for PST content), and significant effects of lytic toxicity on growth ( p = 0.0125, p = 0.0175, for PST production and C fraction, respectively).
moderately significantp -value < 10 − 40.0× alphaqualifiedgold
In the present study, only intronic and downstream gene variants within ZFAT were moderately significant (unadjusted p -value < 10 − 4 ) and only two missense variants within ZFAT were segregating (rs483021047 and rs526028162), neither of which were significant in the AA population.
marginally significantP < 0.00010.0× alphagold
This analysis revealed that samples of genotype SBb display significantly lower relative amounts of SiOR89 (by 50%) and marginally significant for SiOR88 (by 37%), as compared with SBB samples from either monogyne or polygyne colonies ( fig. 1 c ; P < 0.0001 and P = 0.07, respectively, Tukey post hoc tests following a mixed effects model analysis).
extremely significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualified
As shown in Figure 2 A and summarized in Table S1 , the type of LAB fermentation had an extremely significant and substantial impact on the soluble sugar content of the QJ beverage ( p < 0.0001), decreasing from 28.75 ± 0.12 to 26.11 ± 0.80, 21.61 ± 1.25, and 22.13 ± 1.32 mg/mL by the fermentation using the Lf14, Lr18 and Lp808 strains, respectively.