Excerpts

ANOVA results revealed a significant ( p < 0.0005) and highly significant ( p < 0.0001) difference in genotypes and B toxicity treatment ( Table 2 ). 3.4.

Analysis of response surface and contour plots For all types of oil yields, the single factor particle size (i.e., 150–355 μm) was shown to be statistically highly significant ( p < 0.0001).

The data show that BNN displays a highly significant inhibitory effect ( p < 0.0001) on h MAO-B ( Figure 1(a) ), but, in the presence of h MAO-A ( Figure 1(b) ), BNN inhibitory effect was less.

AFP 137 differences approached significance (p = 0.06) and AFP 325 differences were highly significant (p < 0.0001).

Correlations Relationships of antibody levels between and in CSF and serum A highly significant correlation between CSF and serum anti-tau IgG antibodies was observed in the MS group as well as in the control group (r = 0.6, p<0.0001; r = 0.7, p<0.0001; respectively).

Most importantly, the LC3-II/LC3-I ratio, which measures autophagy activity, showed a highly significant increase in the iridocorneal region of the aging mice ( 4 months: 1.106 ± 0.21, n = 5; 18 months: 2.178 ± 0.10, n = 4; P < 0.0001, t -test) ( Fig. 2 C).

All the models were highly significant ( p < 0.0001), describing a high degree of correlation between the experimental and predicted values.

Physical and psychological QoL increases after SNM implantation were highly significant ( p < 0.0001 for both), with median increases of 13 and 11.5, respectively.

A smoothed spline Cox PH model (Figure 3 ) showed a highly significant ( P value <0.0001), mostly linear relationship between patient age and increasing risk for log‐transformed mortality.

This increase was highly significant (p<0.0001).

According to the ANOVA analysis in Table 2 , the model F = 36.24, p < 0.0001, and the established model is extremely significant ( p < 0.0001).

The t -test applied for ABIM versus NIM and ABMA versus NMA yielded highly significant result with P < 0.0001*.

The Fisher’s Kappa was 16.924 and Bartlett’s Kolmogorov–Smirnov was 0.281, which was highly significant ( P < 0.0001).

All smooth functions were highly significant ( P < 0.0001).

Immunohistochemistry showed that NAC1 and FASN immunointensities in ovarian serous carcinoma tissues had a highly significant correlation ( P < .0001).

A highly significant decrease in RTP volume by median of 2.1 μl from 33.3 μl in the cold state to 31.2 μl after heating was measured (p<0.0001).

There was significant difference between virtually all antibiotics in the two periods studied, which was commonly highly significant ( p < 0.0001); however, no difference was observed between the antibiotics used for coverage of Gram-positive bacteria, except for rifampin and oxacillin.

There was a markedly significant difference in the median PCT level between bacteria-infected subgroup A (0.24 ng/mL) and TF subgroup A (0.05 ng/mL) ( p < 0.0001) ( Figure 2(a) ).

A one‐way ANOVA revealed a highly significant effect of site type on altitude (F 2 , 213 = 166.6, p < 0.0001).

The observed difference between those with and without MetS was relatively small (747 vs 704 μm), but highly significant ( P < 0.0001), even after adjustment for age, sex, and race/study [ 20 ].

All T 2 values are highly significant ( p < 0.0001), indicating a strong, consistent influence of factors (time from surgery, speed of walking) on the electromyographic profile.

Combined correlation analyses using all protein analytes resulted in a highly significant correlation ( P < 0.0001) between DISSECT-flow and imaging data, and between DISSECT-flow and immunoblotting data.

All of the parameters used to describe resistance changes showed highly significant changes with the degree of airway obstruction ( P <0.0001).

The difference between these means is highly significant (n = 28; P<0.0001, paired t test, two tailed).

This difference was highly significant ( P < 0.0001).