Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The treatment with IAA caused a highly significant ( p < 0.0001) increase in pericycle periclinal proliferation in comparison with HF ( Figure 3 A), however only ectopic protoxylem was formed ( Figure 2 E) and the AR number did not increase significantly ( Figure 3 B).
highly significantP< 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
These two tests reveal a highly significant difference (P< 0.0001) between the values of wing-shaped Procrustes in the females of the three species ( Table 3 ).
highly significantp < .00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The variance of repeated measurements in all models is statistically highly significant (Wald Z > 4.4, p < .0001), indicating that the variation resulting from multiple measurements of the same city using different methods and indicators constitutes the primary component that the model needs to explain.
highly significantp-value < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
A statistical significance threshold of p<0.05 was established, marking the cut-off for inferring meaningful differences in the data (** p-value < 0.01 denotes strong statistical significance; *** p-value < 0.001 signifies highly significant statistical difference; **** p-value < 0.0001 demonstrates extremely significant statistical significance.).
extremely significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualified
Linear regression of wound healing profiles altogether showed that the differences between the elevations or intercepts (i.e., X -intercept when Y = 0.0 and thus closure time) were extremely significant between the stimulated samples at 1 Hz and 80 Hz and the control specimens ( p < 0.0001).
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
obese was highly significant, **** p < 0.0001, whereas obesity-resistant vs . obese was also highly significant (**** p < 0.0001, TMCT), and no significant differences between lean and obesity-resistant mice were observed (ns, TMCT).
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
There was a highly significant, negative correlation between fALFF and Andrew's score ( Fig. 4 h; rho = −0.715, p < 0.0001; Spearman correlation test), suggesting that the amplitude of haemodynamic oscillations correlates not only to the overall changes in glial reactivity in each individual, but also to the spatial extent of the glial reactivity, and that the local presence of reactive glia is needed for this vasomotion amplification to occur.