Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

highly significantP <0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The second validation step performed by MS-qPCR on core biopsies from 131, 59 and 36 patients with histologically diagnosed PCa, BPH and high-grade PIN, respectively, showed highly significant differences in the methylation status of the APC, TACC2, RARB, DGKZ, C5orf4 and HES5 regions between BPH and PCa ( P <0.0001).
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
In contrast, particularly at 10 μM, a highly significant ( p < 0.0001) anti-clonogenic effect (26% inhibition) was found in MDA-MB-468 cells after three hours of exposure; meanwhile, there was a gradual decrease with increasing TQ concentration, exhibiting a significant 90% inhibition of colony formation at the highest tested concentration, 50 μM.
highly significantP < 10 −40.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Using a degree‐constrained method of permutation to test the null ( H 0 ) versus alternative hypothesis ( H 1 ) of whether the number and degree distribution of disease‐causing genes account for the number of disease subnetworks, in each case the observed number of disease subnetworks is highly significant ( P < 10 −4 ; Supp.
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
As presented in Table 7 , the ANOVA results indicate that the factors of models A, B, C, D, AC, BC, BD, CD, A 2 , B 2 , and C 2 are D 2 < 0.05 (at the 95% confidence level, p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant and p < 0.0001 was considered statistically highly significant) [ 14 , 20 , 21 ], indicating that the effects of the nitric acid concentration, leaching temperature, liquid–solid ratio, total pressure, as well as the interactions between these factors and their squared effects on the vanadium leaching efficiency were significant.
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
However, repeating this analysis with every patient in the study population assigned a NF-κB score according to mutation status (which makes use of all study data) and relating this to affected bone numbers, the result was highly significant both when we included all patients (r = 0.277, p < 0.0001) and also when the two patients with A427D mutations were excluded (r = 0.244, p < 0.001) (data not shown). 3.4 Impact of mutations on UBA domain structure and dimerisation We next sought to understand the structural basis of the effects of the I424S and A427D mutants on SQSTM1's ubiquitin-binding function revealed in the pull-down assays ( Fig. 1 b), and in particular, given the close proximity of these mutations to the site affected by the previously characterised G425R mutant, whether common or distinct mechanisms are manifested.