Excerpts

In Tvedestrandsfjord, which included five replicate egg samples but no adults, there was a highly significant heterogeneity among temporal samples in proportions of the two types ( p < 0.0001: Table 1 ).

There was a highly significant correlation between 3‐epi‐25‐OH‐D 3 and 25‐OH‐D 3 concentrations ( r = 0.77, R 2 = 0.5911, slope = 0.0579, p < 0.0001).

Compared to early presentation (≤ 13 weeks), late presentation (> 27 weeks) to mental health clinics was a highly significant risk ( p = 0.0001) for suicidality in women.

Gal-9 induced a substantial, highly significant ( P < 0.0001), and dose-dependent increase in SARS-CoV-2 cell-surface attachment ( Figure 2 A).

When the data from all five experiments are pooled, this reduction is very highly significant ( P <0.0001).

Considering the set of GO terms that are highly significant in snRNA-seq (adjusted p -value < 0.0001), 42 out of 47 GO terms identified that were also significant in proteomics (adjusted p -value < 0.05) had the same direction of up/down-regulation.

There was a significant trend between the smallest and largest shops for the presence of a safety committee ( P < 0.0001); its presence went from 21% in the smallest shops to 77% in the largest.

In the three-dimensional regression ( Y = aX 3 + bX 2 + cX ), each coefficient was highly significant ( P < 0.0001 for a , b , and c ), and AIC was −64.835 ( Table 2 ).

Nematode feeding groups When all samples were assigned into four groups by feeding type ( Table 1 ), analysis of variance showed highly significant differences in δ 15 N ( p < 0.0001) between the plant feeder and other feeders and in δ 13 C (F 3;33 = 24.18 p < 0.0001) between all groups.

A highly significant overlap was found (Fisher’s Exact Test p < 0.0001), with 61 transcripts shared between the two sets.

When paired samples of JIA PBMCs and SFMCs were analyzed, the reduced expression of CD73 on CD8+ T cells from the SF compared to the PB was highly significant ( P < 0.0001) (Figure 1 C).

On the other hand, the results of Bartlett’s test were found to be highly significant ( p < 0.0001).

This analysis revealed a highly significant effect of condition, F (2, 78) = 19.2, P < 0.0001.

Relative to central hospitals, patients at hospitals in the most peripheral quartile had significantly higher odds of death, but patients at hospitals in quartile 2 were no different from the reference, and those in quartile 3 were borderline significant for reduced mortality (OR (95% CI): Q1 2.10 (1.76–2.51), p<0.0001; Q2 1.00 (0.87–1.15), p = 0.997; Q3 0.89 (0.79–1.00), p = 0.050; Q4 (reference)).

Throughout the biophysical simulations for ligand screening, the effects of each lipocalin, the ligand and their interactions on the dependent variable for the binding energy and distance from the active site were highly significant ( P-value < 0.0001; Table 1 ).

When the eight single‐genotype variants were combined and compared against the WT parental virus treatment, there was a highly significant difference between the two types of virus treatments, that is multiple‐genotype WT vs. single‐genotype variants (treatment: χ 1 2 = 24·81, P < 0·0001), with the slope of the relationship between virus dose and virus‐induced mortality being steeper for the WT virus (log 10 dose × variant: χ 1 2 = 4·66, P = 0·025).

In the subgroup with low or intermediate risk of recurrence the differences in the recurrence-free survival did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.36), however, in high-risk cases there were highly significant differences among the surgical groups (p <0.0001, Figure 2 ).

Noteworthy, those subjects showed highly significant differences compared to the healthy control group in the context of both, VSEL (p < 0.0001) and HSC (p <0.0001) populations ( Figure 1D ). 3.2.

lar region, maximum temperature in the ocular region, standard deviation of temperature in the digital flexor tendons of the hind limb, standard deviation of temperature in the tarsus region, maximum temperature in the thorax, and average temperature in the coronary region of the thoracic limb made highly significant contributions ( p < 0.0001) to the discriminant functions when qualitative gait evaluation levels were the clustering criteria.

As expected, both the total differentiation and differentiation along each of the two first axes, were highly significant (global F ST = 0.19, p <0.0001; PCA1 F ST = 0.050, p <0.0001; PCA2 F ST = 0.046, p <0.0001).

Underestimation of FDG uptake in bone was also found on MR/PET due to an under-correction of cortical bone when creating an MR-based attenuation map, although there was a highly significant correlation between the SUVs for MR/PET and PET/CT ( p < 0.0001) ( 45 ).

Two-way ANOVA indicated that there were no significant effect of OB [ F (1, 22) = 2.29, p = 0.1441], an extremely significant effect of magnesium [ F (1, 22) = 142.84, p < 0.0001], and a very significant interaction [ F (1, 22) = 8.06, p = 0.0095].

The median levels are about 12.40 ng/mL in Q1, 12.06 ng/mL in Q2, 11.54 ng/mL in Q3, and 10.45 ng/mL in Q4, with highly significant differences between the quartiles ( P < 0.0001).

Logistic regression provided a good description of the data for both populations and accession effects were highly significant ( p ≤ 0.0001).

Methylation discrepancies (MF GAmCGC -MF GmCGCT’ ) were calculated in seven out of eight isolates were highly significant ( p -values < 0.0001).