The heterogeneity in the studies was highly significant with I 2 value of 78.36% and the corresponding p-value < 0.0001.
Excerpts
Pairwise rank order correlations are highly significant (p<0.0001), however, ovarian tumors consistently exhibit the lowest correlations (mean ρ=0.896±0.014) while breast tumors exhibit the highest correlations (mean ρ=0.961±0.028).
This was tested, with the results presented in Table 4 , where the likelihood ratio, score and Wald tests were all highly significant ( p -value < 0.0001), which means that at least one of the parameters is not equal to zero.
The apparent 10.2/7.6 mmHg difference between inpatients and outpatients was only slightly reduced to 8.0/5.1 mmHg after adjustment for baseline and remained highly significant (p < 0.0001/p < 0.0001) even after correction for cluster effects.
In each subject large off–axis placement of the laser beam caused a highly significant (p < 0.0001) RNFL thickness measurement artifacts in almost all sectors.
Correlation between profiling and individual qPCR technical validation for three miRNAs in the top 50 was highly significant ( p < 0.0001; R squared between 0.6344 and 0.8644; Supplementary Figure S1 ).
The analysis revealed a highly significant influence of pH on Cr( vi ) photoreduction efficiency ( F = 762.06, p < 0.0001), with an R 2 = 0.9965, confirming that pH accounted for over 99% of the total variation in removal performance.
Finally, the correlation of AD-SoS values between the digits was established and found to be highly significant (p<0.0001).
Although only a few taxa spanned such a wide range, every parasite had highly significant among‐population differences in prevalence (binomial GLMs, all P < 0.0001).
To further characterize what the changes across time were, a linear contrast of the interaction term was determined and was found to be highly significant (p<0.0001), indicating that the groups made linear changes across time with different slopes.
Consistent with this, a highly significant reduction in biofilm formation was observed in the ΔGB mutants compared to the WT parental strains (unpaired t test, P < 0.0001) ( Fig. 4 D ).
When we focused on the distribution of genotypes containing the mutant alleles (DG+GG and RH+HH), we found highly significant differences between cases and controls ( χ 2 = 16.2, P < 0.0001 for TAP1 -rs1135216 and χ 2 = 4.5, P = 0.03 for PSMB9 -rs17587). 3.3.
In addition, a highly significant correlation between the zinc concentration and age was observed in the child group (r = 0.298, p < 0.0001), with a plateau at ages over 10 years ( Fig. 6 ).
The differences between these slopes were extremely significant ( F = 368.13, P < 0.0001).
Serratia oderifera showed highly significant resistance to CEP (P <0.0001), STR (P <0.0001), CHL (P <0.0001) in non-pregnant women than in pregnant women contrary to DOX (P <0.0001) ( Table 2 ).
A significant trend in the reduction of implantation of mechanical vs. biological prostheses was observed during the study period ( p < 0.0001).
Comparison of best-fit regression lines by sum-of-squares F -test showed that the increases in MBP and SBP were highly significant ( p < 0.0001 for both) and the increase in DBP was also significant ( p = 0.0056).
The changes in ESR values were highly significant (P ≤ 0.0001) in both the CuroWhite treatment groups.
There are highly significant age differences across all comparisons: HC vs. pMS ( p < 0.0001), HC vs. fMS ( p < 0.0001), and pMS vs. fMS ( p < 0.0001).
The correlation was highly significant ( p < 0.0001).
Similarly, CT chest, covid pattern lung involvement percentage showed highly significant reduction (P < 0.0001) in Siddha add on treatment.
Quantitative analysis of the percentage of CD45+ tumor cells expressing CD38 in each condition revealed a highly significant decrease in the cells treated with αCD38 antibody ( p < 0.0001 by an unpaired t test) (Fig. 2D ).
This difference was highly significant ( p < 0.0001).
Consequently, when in vivo and ex vivo periods were plotted together, the control groups exhibited a highly significant within-animal correlation, but the VPAC2-Cre/ Ck1ε Tau/– group did not ( Fig. 2 D ; Pearson correlation, Controls: r = 0.923, p < 0.0001, VPAC2-Cre/ Ck1ε Tau/– : r = 0.598, p = 0.07).
When comparing the PI and mSBI, it was found that there was a highly significant drop from baseline to 6 months ( P = 0.0001).