The diminution seen was highly significant ( p < 0.0001) as determined by paired Wilcoxon signed-rank sum test.
Excerpts
Consistent with this, a highly significant reduction in biofilm formation was observed in the ΔGB mutants compared to the WT parental strains (unpaired t test, P < 0.0001) ( Fig. 4 D ).
mansoni cysteine peptidases, leading to consistent and highly significant ( P < 0.0001) 50–83% protection of outbred mice against S. mansoni challenge infection ( 15 ).
The learning gadget item was found to be not significant on the cognitive factor (loading = −0.16, P = 0.43) but highly significant on the functional factor (loading = 0.84, P < 0.0001).
This difference remained highly significant after formal statistical comparison (Mann–Whitney U test, p < 0.0001) ( Figure 7 ).
Our results indicated that while alpha-tocopherol exerted no significant effect on EGFR expression in the evaginated protoscoleces, highly significant difference in EGFR expression was observed in the in vitro segmented worms ( P <0.0001, Fig. 2a ).
ANOVA results ( Supplementary material 1 , Table S5 ) indicated that the model was highly significant (P < 0.0001), while the lack-of-fit was not significant (P = 0.102 > 0.05), supporting good model adequacy within the studied region.
bassiana CBM1 was 42.92%, while the rate for the soil drench treatment was 81.25%, with a highly significant difference (T = 18.40, df = 4, p < 0.0001).
The differences between time points were highly significant (**** p < 0.0001), reflecting structural maturation of the biofilm ( Figure 6 ).
Among patients treated with sarilumab or tocilizumab, the difference in survival between the high- and low-risk groups was highly significant ( P < 0.0001).
The liposome-based neutralization test results correlated excellently and were highly significant with those of the pVNT ( Table S6 ), for both overall comparison (Spearman R = 0.86, p < 0.0001) as well as variant-specific comparison (all R > 0.9, all p < 0.00024) ( Figure ).
Likewise, the difference between the T1/T2 and T3/T4 groups was highly significant (p = 0.0001) ( Figure 3 ).
Linear regression model showed a positive trend toward increasing KI with molecular subtypes in both age groups ( P <0.0001), Figure 1 .
There was a highly significant media*volatile interaction ( p < 0.0001) for the raw responses reflective of compounds that not only differ in media solubility but also differences in response factors arising from electron impact mass spectrometry.
In pan-cancers, GPR18 mRNA expression levels demonstrated extremely significant Pearson correlations (Pearson R values) with MS4A1 and TIL-B levels across all 29 cancer types, except for DLBC and UVM ( R > 0.2, P < 0.0001; Fig. 4b , Supplementary Fig. 4 ).
A chi-square test with 10,000 permutations testing between this distribution returned a highly significant result ( χ 2 = 45.8, p < 0.0001; Fisher’s exact p = 3.3 × 10−8, OR = 0.11), indicating a significant difference between the distribution of raw materials between cores and SFD.
65,66 Statistical analysis confirmed these reductions were highly significant ( p < 0.0001) compared with the EAC control.
Overall, the model was highly significant with an adjusted R 2 of 0.54 ( p -value <0.0001).
The overall across-population difference in CYP2C8 allele frequencies was highly significant for three polymorphic variants (rs11572080 [* 3 ], rs11572103 [* 2 ], rs10509681 [* 3 ]; p <0.0001).
Fear of parental accident modelisation and car accidents death rate The ecological variable, car accident death rate per 100,000 population, was highly significant and indicated that higher rates were associated with increased odds of reporting fear of a parent’s accident (p<0.0001).
34 A highly significant association also was observed using this alternative measure ( P < .0001; Table V ; available at www.jpeds.com ).
As expected, there was also a highly significant difference between thicknesses in different ETDRS subfields (p < 0.0001) and different layers (p < 0.0001).
Two-way ANOVA revealed highly significant main effects of both cell type (F 1,14 = 89.42, p < 0.0001) and ZnO concentration (F 3,14 = 11.00, p < 0.001), with no significant interaction effect (F 3,14 = 1.25, p = 0.326), indicating that the differential sensitivity pattern remains consistent across all tested concentrations.
In Figure 2 as well as in Figure 3 of their study ( 1 ) they demonstrated a clearly significant difference between the TYM scores between controls and AD patients as well as between moderate AD and severe AD patients (both p < 0.0001).
The data indicate that the regression model is highly significant ( p < 0.0001), while the error term is not significant ( p > 0.05).