Excerpts

Findings: Multivariate analysis showed a strong and highly significant independent association between MRSA infection at admission and prior home nursing care (OR = 3.7, P < 0.0001).

However, these results indicate a highly significant ( P < 0.0001) almost tenfold increase in the number of cells lacking MYO6 with an abnormal TBC structure, visualized by F-actin staining.

There was a highly significant relationship between SNP source and true/false-positive SNP outcome (Fisher’s exact test, p < 0.0001); SNPs from non-genic single-copy BESs had a higher chance of being true-positive (58.3%) than those from genic BESs (47.0%).

After excluding rhinoviruses and coronaviruses, the difference remained highly significant (31% versus 8%, P < 0.0001).

For weight gain over the entire period from the second trimester to 18 months, PPAR γ 2 Pro12Pro carriers had a significantly lower growth rate for weight than the other genotypes, and there was a significant trend for each additional Ala12 allele ( P < 0.0001).

The differences in the duration of clutch stages 2–4 were highly significant (F 2,18 = 861.20, p < 0.0001 and F 2,18 = 408.22, p < 0.0001, the most conservative and liberal estimates, respectively), as were those concerning their rate of embryonic development (F = 22.99, p < 0.0001), and neither of these varied significantly among females (stage duration more conservative: F 9,18 = 0.46, p = 0.88; stage duration most liberal: F 9,18 = 1.66, p = 0.17; embryonic development rate: F 9,18 = 0.92, p = 0.53) ( Figure 2 ).

As the tumor sets were very large, statistical differences between the ERG positive and negative groups were still highly significant ( p < 0.0001; Figure 2 ).

Such a difference is statistically highly significant (p < 0,0001), despite the small number of patients.

Both predictors are highly significant ( p < 0.0001 ).

These effects were highly significant after adjustment for multiple comparisons (p<0.0001, Table S2 ).

There were also highly significant differences in cell-count ratios between isolines selected for large and small body size ( p < 0.0001).

With regard to the relationship between mismatch repair (MMR) status and cancer stage, this was associated with a highly significant difference in stage distribution between dMMR cases ( n = 148) and all MMR cases ( n = 893) ( χ 2 (4) = 38.25, p < 0.0001).

Statistical analysis confirmed a highly significant efficacy of Pr10-MMAE treatment compared to both the control and free-MMAE-treated groups ( p < 0.0001). 3.3.

Extremely significant differences ( p < 0.0001) were demonstrated by ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post-hoc test between the concentrations of 0–1.95 μg/mL ( Figure 4 A).

There was the highly significant difference in means of SpO 2 in Group A ( P < 0.0001) at 3.5 min (SpO 2 of 96.9%) from baseline when the nose was covered by rubber dam given by post-hoc analysis.

LPS administration induced a highly significant BW loss in both strains (Treatment: F (1,36) = 175.8, p < 0.0001; Strain: F (1,36) = 20.18, p < 0.0001; strain × treatment: F (1,36) = 3.80, p = 0.06).

The trophozoites treated with nitroxoline showed a highly significant decrease in ATP levels compared to the negative control, p < 0.0001 (****) ( Figure 7 ).

Finally, from April to October, the fat-to-protein ratio in high-yield cows was lower than in low-yield cows, showing a highly significant difference ( p < 0.0001).

The cytotoxicity was anti-rTsE antibody dose dependent (r = 0.898, P < 0.0001), and the cytotoxicity had a decreasing trend following the increase in serum dilutions ( F = 44.582, P < 0.0001).

6 In contrast, Khan et al did not confirm the advantage of RARC in terms of EBL (RARC 585 ml vs ORC 808 ml; p=0.070), even if a trend towards significance was observed. 7 Finally, the RAZOR trial showed the advantage of RARC in terms of EBL (RARC 300 ml vs ORC 700 ml; p <0.0001), describing lower intra- (RARC 13% vs ORC 34%; p <0.0001) and postoperative (RARC 25% vs ORC 40%; p=0.0089) transfusion rates. 8 Our study confirmed significantly lower transfusions rates in the RARC cohort, with comparable intraoperative and a trend towards significantly lower postoperative transfusion rates.

Bartlett's test of sphericity showed the all-round relation between variables and total sample size to be highly significant ( p > 0.0001**) to proceed towards factor analysis as seen in Table 2 .

There were highly significant effects of three of the four individual variables on epitope-specific endpoint titers (p<0.0001); the only individual variable not having a significant effect on antigen endpoints was the geographic origin of the sera (p = 0.0709).

Indeed, a highly significant decrease ( p < 0.0001) in BV/TV was noted at the distal femur following maternal exposure to Cd during pregnancy and lactation compared to the control group and Zn group ( p < 0.01).

However, the results also showed a highly significant difference between patients and controls regarding age (P≤ 0.0001, patients were higher than controls), whereas, in weight and body mass index (BMI) (P=0.0006 and 0.0002, respectively higher in controls compared to patients).

Figure 4 shows a bar graph of the average A , ε m a x , ε ∞ , τ r of the 4 cell lines and indicates the level of significance: where p > 0.05 is not significant (ns), 0.01 < p < 0.05 is significant (*), 0.001 < p < 0.01 is very significant (**), 0.0001 < p < 0.001 is extremely significant (***) and p < 0.0001 is extremely significant (****), raw values can be found in Table S1 .