A strong and highly significant correlation was observed between plasma and PBMC-expressed SDC3 levels ( r = 0.921; p < 0.0001).
Excerpts
The ROC curve plotted to evaluate the value of SC percentage for prediction of positive ZAP-70 expression revealed a highly significant area under the curve of 0.936 ( P =0.0001) with a cutoff value of 8.5% and sensitivity 0.966 ( Fig. 2 ).
The quadratic regression model was highly significant, which was evident from the F-test with a very low probability value ( p <0.0001).
Age Dependency of Clinical Signs of SINS in Piglets SINS+LL and SINS−LL scores in 1 to 7-day-old piglets showed a highly significant correlation (r = 0.815; p < 0.0001) with the actual day of scoring and therefore with the age of the piglet.
R6/2-PBS mice was highly significant ( p < 0.0001) ( Figure 4 A,B).
However, when we compare the cumulative data for all time points of the pooled control (negative and solvent control) to the replicates of the positive control, the difference for the moved distance between these two groups was highly significant ( p < 0.0001, Fig. 3 ).
When BMI and diastolic blood pressure were entered together, BMI remained highly significant (Wald χ 2 = 67.9669, p < 0.0001).
Likewise, the 10-mm diffusion tip with 15 W power yielded a highly significant correlation (r = 0.995, p < 0.0001).
Even after adjusting for systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, age, and gender, its association remains highly significant ( Figure S1c , odds ratio: 1.082, p < 0.0001).
The association between up-regulation of CYP17A1 mRNA expression and DDTs concentration in sampled livers was highly significant (p < 0.0001).
However, when studied ex vivo by γ-counting, both monotherapy and combination therapy showed highly significant effects on tracer retention (Supplemental Fig. 3; P < 0.0001 and P = 0.0007, respectively), but there was no difference between treated tumors with and without gemcitabine ( P = 0.9).
For example, Fig 5 shows one example of a highly significant relationship between the date and phi (β = 1.779, p<0.0001).
Highly significant difference (χ 2 = 19.55, df = 1, p < 0.0001) was observed in the seroprevalence of gSG6-P1 IgG in Simiw [81.3% (282/347)] than Obom [65.5% (190/292)] (Table 2 ).
Statistical testing showed highly significant differences in both the SD and IQR, giving p -values of <0.0001.
These differences were highly significant for both wild type and Atxn2 ko mice (ANOVA with repeated measure, P<0.0001).
It exhibited highly significant inhibition as compared to thiourea ( p < 0.0001).
candida for 266 MV over 266 was highly significant with p < 0.0001.
The day × pasture treatment interaction was not significant in 2017 ( p = 0.302), but the main effect for the RFI group tended to be significant ( p = 0.059), and day and pasture treatment were both highly significant ( p < 0.0001).
Temporal and Road Type-Based Trends of Raccoon Dog Roadkills Although highly significant (F 5,3229 = 25.0, p < 0.0001), the GLM model explained only 3.6% of the raccoon dog index variance.
Using independent t -test for the out-of-pocket expenditure incurred during ANC Visits at government and private health set up, it was found that there was highly significant difference between governments and private expenditures for registration, Ultrasonography (USG), laboratory tests, medicines ( P < 0.0001) and transportation ( P = 0.001).
By 24 h, frankincense, lemon, lemongrass, patchouli, peppermint, geranium, palmarosa, and sage EOs exhibited a certain level of toxicity, indicating an extremely significant difference compared to the control ( p ≤ 0.0001).
A GLM with a negative binomial distribution with a log link function showed a highly significant positive effect of nest type on the number of trips per female [slope = 2.902, t = 7.078, P < 0.0001, dp = 1.119; dp is the dispersion parameter of the model, and when this is 1, the dispersion of the data from the model is within the predicted variance from the model (meaning the model fitted well to the observed data)].
The results of the ANOVA test on vasculitis parameters were highly significant ( p < 0.0001, refers to Supplementary Table S1 ).
5 , N = 102 patients) revealed highly significant differences in SOZ and non‐SOZ channels ( P < 0.0001; Wilcoxon rank sum) in aggregate and in individual epilepsy patients ( N = 90, P < 0.0001, Sign test).
Specifically, the analysis of the data revealed a highly significant difference (p<.0001) in the ratings for each factor, suggesting that some factors may have a greater impact than others on the decision-making process.