Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

highly significantP < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Mixed‐effects ANOVA analysis showed a significant effect of time ( **** P < 0.0001, F 14,140 = 13.02), no significant effect of the genotype ( ns P = 0.1975, F 1,10 = 1.906), no significant genotype × treatment interaction ( ns P = 0.1926, F 1,10 = 1.952) and highly significant time × genotype × treatment interaction ( **** P < 0.0001, F 14,110 = 4.085; Figure 3C,D ).
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
When comparing both right and left eye datasets, the column factor (indicating differences between corresponding LA3 versus RoB records) was highly significant ( p < 0.0001) and the average difference between predicted means was 2.91 ± 0.46 μV for right eyes and 3.0 ± 0.68 μV for left eyes, while the ratio between the predicted means was 1.71 for right eyes and 1.67 for left eyes.
highly significantP=0001the decimal point is missing; read as 0.0001qualifiedgold
Figures 1 and 2 illustrate the tumor budding categories. Tumor budding and advanced tumor stage, tumor invasion, vascular invasion, perineural invasion, and desmoplasia were significantly associated. The link between regional lymph node metastases and tumor budding was highly significant (P=0001).
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
However, when considering the cerebellum as reference region, correlations between DVR-1 based on AV shunt and IDIF were strong and highly significant in all regions ( r = 0.978, p < 0.0001 in striatum; r = 0.967, p < 0.0001 in cortex; r = 0.955, p < 0.0001 in hippocampus; r = 0.934, p < 0.0001 in thalamus) (Figure 2B and Supplementary Table 2 ).
highly significantp = 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
This was confirmed via a 2-way permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA) analysis which identified a highly significant effect on diversity between adult, tadpole and water samples (F = 10.71; df = 2; p = 0.0001), a significant effect due to the housing conditions (F = 2.84; df = 1; p = 0.0056), but also a significant interaction effect due to the fact that diversity in tadpoles differs significantly between clean and standard conditions whilst it remains consistent in adults (F = 2.69; df = 2; p = 0.0011).