Excerpts

For the TbGK protein, there was no significant difference (p = 0.08) in RPP medians values between positive and negative sera ( Fig 3A and Table 3 ) compared to TcoCB1, TbWTL, and TcWTL, which showed highly significant differences (p<0.0001) between sera from infected and non-infected cattle groups ( Fig 3B ).

The decrease in phagocytosis of each Borrelia strain by the two inhibitors, alone or in combination, were highly significant (p<0.0001).

Another t -test was conducted for the average PDI values between the 2 μm/30 nm compared to PEG, which showed an extremely significant value ( p ≤ 0.0001).

This difference was highly significant ( P <0.0001).

The Analysis of Variance on memory performance on the three word categories across the two participant groups revealed a highly significant main effect of word category in both ISR ( F (2, 40) = 33.9, p < 0.0001) and DSR ( F (2, 34) = 48.4, p < 0.0001).

In particular: “Working duties” and “Change in the institute of reference” are highly significant (p < 0.0001). “Difficulties in the use of technology”, “Family duties”, “Worsening of health conditions”, and “No response” show significant differences with p < 0.05. “Laziness” does not show a significant difference (p > 0.05). 4.

A Kruskal-Wallis test indicated that the difference in NPRA expression among the seven diagnostic groups was highly significant (p < 0.0001).

The results were highly significant ( P < 0.0001).

Highly significant differences between pre- and post-weaning piglets were found ( P = 0.0001, P = 0.001 and P = 0.0001, for Envfit, Anosim and Adonis tests, respectively).

The decrease and increase in serum cortisol levels were highly significant ( P -value < 0.0001).

The Chi-squared test revealed a highly significant association between species (species represented by >50 cases) and causes of death (x 2 = 97.95; df = 12; p < 0.0001), indicating that mortality patterns varied considerably between taxa.

The regression model was highly significant (F = 175.47, p < 0.0001), while the lack of fit was not significant ( p = 0.3775), indicating that the fitted quadratic model adequately described the experimental data.

With the HEMI groups, although LIB appeared to induce a slight decrease in reversal learning during both dark phases, these differences did not reach statistical significance upon comparing between the HEMI Sham and Blast groups [Time: F (4.687, 103.2) = 39.35, p < 0.0001; Group: F (1, 30) = 0.2318, p = 0.6337; Time × Group: F (46, 1,380) = 0.4483, p = 0.9995; Subject: F (30,1,380) = 26.52, p < 0.0001]. 3.2 Cognitive flexibility of the reversal learning The main purpose of the reversal learning phase is to evaluate cognitive learning flexibility of the HEMI and NCAR mice.

As seen in Figure 2 , this increase was highly significant in the whole-cell ( Figure 2 A p < 0.0001), the cytosol ( Figure 2 B p < 0.0001), and the nuclear volumes ( Figure 2 C p < 0.0001) when compared to the non-treated cardiomyocytes.

In addition, the difference between real synchrony and surrogate synchrony estimated by SUCO was highly significant ( t (44) = 43.80, p < 0.0001).

Hence, when looking specifically at peritumoral tumor cell clusters as a surrogate of glial migration and infiltration, the average results between control condition (8 animals) and all chemokine groups were highly significant: CXCL10 (7 animals): 37 vs. 7 ( p < 0.0001), CCL2 (9 animals): 37 vs. 28 ( p = 0.0258), CCL11 (8 animals): 37 vs. 25 ( p = 0.0003) and the combination (7 animals): 37 vs. 24 ( p = 0.0070) ( Figure 3 D). 2.2.2.

A p value < 0.05 was considered significant, a p value < 0.01 was considered highly significant, and a p value < 0.0001 was considered extremely significant.

Furthermore, the correlation between both methods was highly significant ( p < 0.0001), with Spearman’s r s = 0.9912 for honey, 0.9492 for hive debris, and 0.9682 for both sample types combined. 3.4.

3b ; p = 0.0006) and the poor prognostic impact of the high signature score was reproduced in the EC cohort with full L1000 gene expression data ( n = 392) (Table 3 , all clinico-pathological variables highly significant; Fig. 3c , p < 0.0001).

A slight decreasing trend of malaria mortality was observed over the whole study period which is however highly significant (p = 0.0001).

In addition to our crucial comparison of the two interference effects, the modulation of the load over the benefits observed for the valid condition was clearly significant, χ 2 (1) = 374.11, p < 0.0001; in fact, we observed (see Figure 7 ) a much larger modulation for the benefits (64 ms larger for high compared to low perceptual load), than for the costs (11 ms larger for high perceptual load).

The present study recorded a higher prevalence of toxoplasmosis in stray cats (74.6%) than in pet cats (25.4%) with highly significant differences ( x 2 = 20.388; p = 0.0001) as shown in (Fig. 2 ).

The Kaplan–Meier survival analysis showed a highly significant difference in OS was detected between the high- and low-risk groups (Log-rank test P < 0.0001), suggesting that the expression of these 5 genes can be effectively distinguished the high- and low-risk of these PC patients (Fig. 4 B and Fig. 5 ).

However, the past five-year trend (2015-2019) was different where, the daily average of PM 2.5 and PM 10 levels (2015-2019) were higher by 70 and 155% when compared with the same time period in 2020 (Phase I), which was highly significant (Kruskal-Wallis test, p <0.0001) (Fig.

In the second cohort, the association was highly significant ( r = −0.60; P < 0.0001) ( Fig. 2 B ).