Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

highly significantP < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
No significant correlation was obtained for solitary fish (Spearman Rank Correlation: R S = -0.325, P = 0.303), while there was highly significant negative correlation for fish in groups ( R S = -0.972, P < 0.0001).
Grouping facilitates avoidance of parasites by fish.
Parasit Vectors · 2013 · PMC3853141
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
In the present study a two-way analysis of ANOVA (age × treatment) showed highly significant differences of age ( F 2, 78 = 43.43, p < 0.0001), treatment ( F 3, 78 = 61.01, p < 0.0001), and age × treatment interaction ( F 6, 78 = 8.706, p < 0.0001; Fig. 5 ).
highly significantp<0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
After accounting for differences due to strategy, mean age and mean PSA in the meta-regression analysis, the amount of residual heterogeneity between studies was calculated to be 76.0, which is highly significant at the 5% level (QE = 176.8, p<0.0001).
highly significantp < .00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
A linear mixed-effects model with stimulation rate and pulse shape (rampUp and rampDown) as fixed factors and subject as random factor reported a highly significant effect of rate ( F (1,117) = 478.44, p < .0001) but not of shape ( F (1,117) = 0.05, p = .8154) or the interaction between rate and shape ( F (1,117) = 0.03, p = .8559) on the angle.
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Retinal sensitivity showed highly significant improvements in the fovea ( p < 0.0001), inferior quadrant ( p < 0.0001), nasal quadrant ( p < 0.0001), and temporal quadrant ( p = 0.0003), while the superior quadrant failed to sustain statistically significant improvement at 1 month ( p = 0.1216).
highly significantp<0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
For the TbGK protein, there was no significant difference (p = 0.08) in RPP medians values between positive and negative sera ( Fig 3A and Table 3 ) compared to TcoCB1, TbWTL, and TcWTL, which showed highly significant differences (p<0.0001) between sera from infected and non-infected cattle groups ( Fig 3B ).
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Regression analyses of all data collected from 2006–2009 for swarming start times (Figure 5 A&B) and end times (Figure 5 C&D) on the concurrent times of local sunset found a highly significant correlation between swarm times and sunset for both species (p < 0.0001, Table 1 ).