Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Statistical significance of the scavenging and inhibitory activities was assessed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) across all concentrations and treatment groups followed by Tukey’s Honest Significant Difference (HSD) post-hoc test for multiple comparisons using GraphPad Prism V.11.0.0.The ANOVA results revealed highly significant differences among all treatment groups ( p < 0.0001), with F-values substantially exceeding the corresponding critical F-value, indicating strong evidence against the null hypothesis Table (S 1,2).
a decreasing trendP < .00010.0× alphagold
Moreover, the mean taxa determinism of bacterial communities exhibited a decreasing trend from S03 to S07 (mean determinism: S03, 39; S05, 22; S07, 19; P < .0001 by the Kruskal–Wallis test), with significant differences observed among the three stations by the Dunn Kruskal–Wallis test (S03 vs S05, adjusted P = .04; S03 vs S07, adjusted P < .0001; S05 vs S07, adjusted P < .0001).
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The Top ICH genes had highly significant and similar associations within the primary cluster that included intratumoral densities of CD45 + (r = 0.53–0.67, all p < 0.0001), CD8 + T cells (r = 0.48–0.71, all p < 0.0001, Fig. 3 B), CD20 + B cells (r = 0.47–0.56, all p < 0.0001), and CD138 + cells (0.37–0.5, all p < 0.0001, Additional file 1 : Table S1).
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
There was a highly significant effect of time (F (5, 153) = 12.80, p < 0.0001) and treatment (F (1, 34) = 4.892, p = 0.0338), but no significant interaction (F (5, 153) = 1.584, p = 0.1677) over the 6-week period indicating that the animals learned the rules of the task, with anthocyanin-rich extract fed animals performing better than the control fed animals.
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Thus, during the transition from pole to brain control in task 1, the average correlated firing between pairs of cortical neurons, measured in terms of correlation coefficient (mean ± SEM), increased from 0.02 ± 1 × 10 −4 to 0.06 ± 2 × 10 −4 , a 3-fold rise that was highly significant (Wilcoxon signed rank test, p < 0.0001).