Excerpts

Interestingly, this SNP was also close to significance for WS ( p = 3.5 × 10 − 5 , not shown in the table).

The difference in distribution between cleaners, nurses, and interns was statistically highly significant ( p = 3.5 E−05, OR = 10.5, 95% CI: 2.8–39.5). 4.

The increase of 12.9% in the gamma power from P 100 N 100 to P 100 N 100 Att was highly significant ( p = 3.5×10 −5 , N = 96, t test).

This approach was further supported by a highly significant effect of the learning configuration × experimental phase interaction ( F = 10.4; p = 3.52 × 10 −05 ) when expanding the model across both phases.

In the TCGA breast cancer dataset, we found a highly significant enrichment of Rank-1 cis genes among genes with amplification-driven gene dependencies (Fisher test one-sided P-value = 3.53e-5).

Nominally significant associations with PD risk were identified for four SNPs: XRCC6 rs5751129 ( p = 3.55 × 10−5), XRCC4 rs28360071 ( p = 0.0181), NBN rs2735383 ( p = 0.0213) and RAD50 rs17772583 ( p = 0.0411).

Nonetheless, the highly significant p -value we obtain for the association mitochondrial genes and AAO of PD ( p -value = 3.56E-05) and the recognized importance of mitochondrial function in aging would suggest that this finding is likely to be robust.

We found a highly significant association ( p = 3.6 × 10 −5 ), with secondary bile acid-producing genes only predicted to be present in samples that also had high predicted levels of butyrate-producing genes (Fig. 7b ).

In model B, the significance level did not change much and remained highly significant ( p = 3.6 × 10 –5 ) ( Table 3 ).

restricta showed a decreasing trend, while M. globosa increased at Week 2 and Week 4 compared to Week 0 (Wilcoxon signed-rank test, p =3.63×10 −5 and 1.56×10 −5 , respectively; Fig. 4C ).

The most common SNP among the causal SNPs was C4S1878 (MAF = 0.16), also in the KDR gene, but it failed to reach significance (−log( P ) = 4.44).

According to an ANOVA analysis the difference in plant biomass is highly significant ( p -value = 3.64e-05) between the two treatments.

Treatment effects were highly significant on both day 6 ( p = 3.7 × 10 −5 ) and particularly day 10 ( p = 2.3 × 10 −9 ).

The DAVID program identified one cluster, characterized by a highly significant enrichment of genes involved in antigen processing and presentation ( p = 3.7e-5).

However, PAR in the recently colonised areas and the nearest range core sites (Fennoscandia, Baltic countries, Germany, and Poland) showed a highly significant negative relationship with latitude ( r 2 = 0.92, β = −3.96 × 10 −4 , SE = 4.31 × 10 −5 , t = −9.19, p = 3.73 × 10 −5 ).

Simply combining all genes (excluding those on the X chromosome) into a single confusion matrix yields highly significant predictability scores (Fig. 3g , average score = 2.2, p ~ 3.74e-5, 3 time points, 5 quads).

Other highly significant associated pathways in this module are all immune-related, of which the most significant is Natural killer cell mediated cytotoxity (P-value = 3.8E -5 ).

4d , left); an increase in mutational frequency with age was highly significant for males ( p = 3.8 E − 5 ), but not for females.

The difference between either of these cohorts and the mutant IDH1 cohort is highly significant (p = 3.8 × 10 −5 ; and 4.0 × 10 −4 , respectively; Figure 2A ).

Females from 1999 to 2008 showed a negative trend (APC − 0.9298%/year, 95% CI: -1.2649 to -0.5937, P = 0.000038), changing into an upward trend shift from 2008 to 2018 (APC 0.9979%/year, 95% CI: 0.6830 to 1.3138, P = 0.000008), continuing through 2018 up until 2021 (APC 8.0298%/year, 95% CI: 4.7989 to 11.3602, P = 0.000085) (Fig. 3 C).

1.95 μg/g, respectively; p = 0.00042), and a similar, highly significant elevation was observed for Cu (median 61.68 vs. 38.43 μg/g, respectively; p = 3.81e-5).

It is also nominally significant in the IGAP GWAS ( p -value = 3.86 × 10 −5 ).

Ketamine concentrations also showed a highly significant difference ( W = 264, adjusted P = 0.0000389), again with higher concentrations recorded in England.

Beginning with occurrence as source language and LPI rank, we note that the correlation is positive, not exceptionally strong, but clearly significant ( R = 0.41, p = 3.9e-05).

The difference between the two areas was highly significant (two-sample t test, t (1405) = 3.2, p = 3.9 × 10 −5 ).