Excerpts

According to this t -test, the difference between the PC1 scores for the cached points and the kill/camp points is highly significant ( t = −10.82, df = 120, p <0.000).

A highly significant difference was found ( P = 0.000) when compared for the marginal discrepancy with a mean difference 0.081887.

Pearson correlation between respective first and second measurements was highly significant at the 0.01 level ( P = 0.000); Pearson r is 0.930 for MD width and 0.980 for BL width.

Local-bed system For 2003, the model of the local-bed system was highly significant at a χ 2 109.641, df = 9 (p < .000), and explained between15.0% (Cox and Snell R Square) and 23.5% (Nagelkerke R Square) of the variance.

A highly significant association was noticed between positive tobacco cessation attitude and the presence of a positive medical history (P=.000).

Differences in these network attributes tested by two‐way analysis of variance (ANOVA) at 0.05 significance level were highly significant ( p = .000; Table 3 ). 3.2.

For seed numbers, PGLS showed highly significant effects of rarity (F = 49, p = 0.000), life form (F = 85, p = 0.000), year (F = 120, p = 0.000), and their interaction (F = 20, p = 0.000).

However, when tested by the independent two-sample t -test (2-tailed), the difference in CO 2 concentrations before and after the ventilation improvement is statistically extremely significant at the 100% confidence interval ( p = 0.000 in Classroom 1, 387 and 740 measurement points; p = 0.008 in Classroom 2, 387 and 718 measurement points).

Results: There was a highly significant ( P = 0) increase in the knowledge of school students after the tuberculosis awareness program by medical undergraduate students.

Male managers in ExpBaseline choose 12.70 euro while those in ExpSelf choose 7.66, a highly significant reduction of 40% (p = 0.000***).

Study 2 showed a trend toward decreased impact (1 to 10: β = −0.42, P = 0.00, P adj . = 0.051), but no significant effect was found in Study 3 (1 to 10: β = 0.11, P = 0.45, P adj . = 0.67).

The difference between the two groups is statistically highly significant (p<0.0000 1).

The association between emotional support provided and satisfaction with providing emotional support was highly significant [satisfied cheering up or helping CNM feel better (χ 2 = 32.54, p < 0.000), satisfaction with showing interest in their personal life (χ 2 = 40.44, p < 0.000), satisfied doing or saying things that were kind or considerate (χ 2 = 67.41, p < 0.000), satisfied helping CNM to solve their problems (χ 2 = 41.83, p < 0.000)].

However, when the DM intake data were normalized against body weight (% BW), then total DM intake demonstrated highly significant differences ( p = 0.000) among the treatments.

Furthermore, there was a statistical trend for the effect of group [ F (1, 30) = 3.6; MSE = 105309.68; p = 0.0 7; η p 2 = 0.11], indicating that the BH group was faster than the PH group.

The mean of sons and daughters on track for each family is 2.05 ± 1.51; the results were highly significant (P = 0.000).

Statistical analysis revealed highly significant differences between techniques (p=0.00).

The requirement of first dose of rescue analgesia was 160 ± 25 min in control group and 360 ± 30 min in ESP groups ( P = 0.00, highly significant) [ Table 2 ].

Vaccination led to a highly significant change of prevalence ( P = 0.00), which resulted in a decreased number of isolates in phylogroup F and considerable increase of clades I/II and phylogroup C, as well as distinct phylogenetic diversification of the strains.

Highly significant main effects of AOI were found [fixations: F (2,5 8 ) = 115.645, p = 0.000, viewing time: F (2,5 8 ) = 92.354, p = 0.000].

Highly significant difference was observed in the source of information among different categories of workers ( P = 0.000 ).

The quadratic models constructed for both response variables were statistically highly significant ( p = 0.000).

In the SIRS criteria, tachycardia, tachypnea, and leukocytosis were highly significant ( P = .000).

Comparison of DOPS scores in three steps shows there is an increasing trend from step one to step three in both procedures [IV catheterization(p=0.000), change dressing(p<0.014)].

To further test for enrichment, the set of 120 overlapping DEGs was then compared to the non-svRNA TFO-based background simulated from 1,000 random enhancer-target sets, which was also highly significant ( P value ≈ 0; Fig.