A moderately significant association of smoking with PCSK-9 use was determined ( p = 0.00).
Excerpts
4 ) In the current study, the administration of CDDP to rats caused nephrotoxicity, as shown by the highly substantial elevation in serum urea and creatinine, renal MDA and NO, with highly significant reduction in creatinine clearance and renal PON 1( P = 0.000) compared to the control group.
For the oil phase, all criteria were highly significant ( p = 0.000), indicating strong effects on the dependent variables.
Plotting the Log2 fold change of the list of genes changes following HCV infection (presented in Fig 1 ) against the Log2 fold change of the list of genes changes in DAAs-treated cured cells show a highly significant correlation in mRNA levels (Spearman rank, cor = 0.91 p = 0) ( Fig 2C ).
The differences in the REALD scores between the subjects with different maximum CPI scores were found to be highly significant ( P = 0.00) ( Table 5 ).
This notion is in agreement with our data, where the regression analysis demonstrated a highly significant positive correlation between the galactose content and anti-cancer activity (R 2 = 0.58, p = 0.000 for B16F10 cell adhesion; R 2 = 0.95, p = 0.000 for anchorage-independent growth of HT-29 cells).
The difference was statistically highly significant in the group receiving 25% sucrose and BF ( P <0.000).
The diagnostic accuracy value of MDW testing for early sepsis detection was highly significant (0.74, p < 0.000).
The lowest C22 value was found in the fifth sampling of Itrana (0.14 mg/kg), whereas the very highly significant highest value ( p = 0.000) was in the fourth sampling of Sinopolese (16.93 mg/kg) which showed a different alkane profile with respect to the other studied cultivars ( Table S2 ).
In the 7th day ( Figure 1 C × MIC and 2 × MIC SH have exceedingly significant differences ( p = 0.000, n = 4).
This difference was again highly significant (two‐sample KS test, P ~ 0).
Similarly, a highly significant (p=0.00) association was found between community self-efforts and practices for control.
Logistic regression showed a highly significant result (Wald statistic = 12.3, df = 1, and P < 0.000), with the following classification parameters: sensitivity = 94.7% and specificity = 86.8%; that is, 94.7% and 86.8% of patients and controls, respectively, were classified correctly.
A highly significant difference was found ( P = 0.000) when compared for the marginal discrepancy with a mean difference 0.081887.
A highly significant reduction ( p < 0.000 ) of TDS was observed in the effluent compared to influent samples. pH is defined as measure of hydrogen ion concentration. pH of the untreated sample was greater than 7 and were up to the maximum value of 10 as shown in Table 1 .
According to the chi-square test, this relation between age and third molars present was found to be highly significant (p=0.00).
The correlation analysis of bone fraction (osteocalcin) and BV/TV (InVesalius + ImageJ) was highly significant ( p = 0.0000), with a moderate effect strength (rho = 0.4942) ( Figure 2 a).
In our cohort, none of the patients had positive synovial fluid crystals but we found a highly significant association (p=0.000) between the presence of chondrocalcinosis (CC) and the criteria fulfilment.
Girls (n = 215) had a BF% of 13.1%, while boys (n = 190) averaged at 11.5%; the difference being statistically highly significant (t = 4.1585. p<.0000).
Normality test: Kolmogorov–Smirnov normality test’s result was highly significant (P = 0.00) and data were considered as abnormally distributed.
in their research done on the potential of salivary protein as a biomarker in the prognosis of diabetes mellitus found that total salivary protein levels were higher in the uncontrolled and controlled diabetic groups than in the healthy nondiabetic group band that the differences were highly significant.[ 11 ] Intergroup comparison of all the parameters showed a statistically significant correlation between RBS and HbA 1c levels ( P = 0.00) in diabetics and healthy individuals.
The analysis of variance (ANOVA) between all the extracts showed a very highly significant difference ( p -value = 0).
Variation in the composition of taxa detected between the water and sediment sample types was highly significant ( P = 0.000, df = 1; Table S4 , Figure S2 ).
The pif1 shift was detected as highly significant by CAGEr ( P = 0), though the shift score was negative (-0.406).
This statistic was highly significant ( p = .0000), indicating the variable depressive symptoms was overdispersed.