Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

highly significantP <2 × 10 -70.0× alphaqualifiedgold
In particular, we found a highly significant positive correlation between disease and the Magenta (comprised of 576 genes) module eigengene ( r = 0.67, P <2 × 10 -7 ), the Brown (2,502 genes) module eigengene ( r = 0.6, P <6 × 10 -6 ), the Light-Cyan (349 genes) module eigengene ( r = 0.42, P <0.002), and the Grey60 (based on 216 genes) module eigengene ( r = 0.47, P <8 × 10 -4 ).
highly significantp < 0.00000020.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Lab values of included intervals ), mean baseline HIC and SF were not different (p < 0.7 and p < 0.2 respectively); overall, HIC and SF worsened during deferiprone treatment (p < 0.001 and p < 0.0003, respectively), and improved during deferasirox treatment (p < 0.001 and p < 0.0001, respectively); follow-up HIC values differing between deferiprone and deferasirox monotherapies were highly significant (p < 0.0000002).
highly significantp =2.0×10 −70.0× alphaqualifiedgold
While rs7041 only had a modest statistical association in our single-SNP GWAS ( p =2.8×10 −4 for antenatal and p =0.01 for cord blood), the results for haplotype association ( Table 4 ) were highly significant (ANOVA p =2.0×10 −7 for antenatal and p =3.0×10 −6 for cord blood).
a strong trendP = 0.00000020.0× alphagold
For example, in a large pooled analysis of 14 cohort studies, there was a strong trend with smoking interval before first birth after adjustment for potential confounders that included age at first birth and number of live births ( P = 0.0000002), whereas after stratification by age at first birth, the trends in each stratum were weaker ( P = 0.12, 0.02, and 0.28) [ 8 ], which is suggestive of confounding.
highly significantp = 2.05 × 10 −70.0× alphaqualifiedgold
For the four higher concentrations, there are highly significant differences among groups (10 −2.5 F 3,76 = 14.145 *** p = 2.05 × 10 −7 ; 10 −2 F 3,76 = 60.371 ***, p = 4.56 × 10 −20 ; 10 −1.5 F 3,76 = 50.504 ***, p = 4.63 × 10 −18 ; 10 − 1 F 3,76 = 26.148 ***, p = 1.01 × 10 −11 ; *** = p < 0.001).
highly significantp = 2.10 × 10 –70.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Polygenetic risk score (PRS) constructed by using three independent SNPs (rs1410996, rs4698775, and rs2043085) showed highly significant association with CSC ( p = 2.10 × 10 –7 ), with the top 10% of subjects with high PRS showing 6.39 times higher risk than the bottom 10% of subjects with lowest PRS.