Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

highly significantP < 2.2e-160.0× alphaqualifiedgold
andersonii (tested via independent samples Wilcoxon rank-sum test), while its F is value was also significantly lower ( P < 0.05).Furthermore, verification of Rarefied Allelic Richness (Ar) via the Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test revealed a highly significant difference between the two species (chi-squared = 1770.3, df = 1, P < 2.2e-16), confirming that the genetic diversity of B. andersonii is robustly higher than that of B. tianguii even after standardizing sample sizes ( Figure 3 ). 3.3.
highly significantp < 2.2e -160.0× alphaqualifiedgold
As a result, we found a highly significant positive relationship between visual bleaching scores on Day 0 and Day 7 post-stress ( Fig 3A and S2 Table , linear mixed effects model, p < 2.2e -16 , marginal R 2 = 0.863, df = 44), such that VBS at Day 0 post-stress was highly predictive of VBS throughout the following seven-day period.
highly significantp = 2.2 × 10 −160.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Finally, we observed a highly significant increase (one-sided Student’s t -test, p = 2.2 × 10 −16 ) in average epistasis values in the winning CR genotypes compared with the overall population, indicating that positive epistasis plays an important role in determining the fittest genotypes in this selection (Fig. 5b ).
highly significantp < 2.2 × 10 −160.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Subsequent statistical analysis revealed a highly significant ( p < 2.2 × 10 −16 ) cell cluster composition between the baseline sample NI Day + 0 ( n = 217 cells) compared to differentiated samples S Day + 15 ( n = 577 cells) and SON Day + 15 ( n = 400 cells) as well as between the differentiated samples ( Figure 3 C, Table S5 ).
highly significantP < 2.2 × 10 −160.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The overall percentage of HG disease was highly significant, with a hazard ratio of 4.45 for the interquartile range (95% confidence interval 3.30–6.01, P < 2.2 × 10 −16 ), and was similar to the percentage of HG disease seen in the worst core.
highly significantp value = 2.2E−160.0× alphaqualifiedgold
In addition, CREB1 is the top upstream regulator of the 465 overlapping differentially expressed genes (see previous texts) and there is a highly significant, negative correlation ( r = − 0.91, p value = 2.2E−16) between the fold changes for these genes—including the 58 direct CREB1 target genes—in the two comparisons (Supplementary Fig. 3 ).
highly significantp-value <2.2×10 −160.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The reversal DEGs obtained from the dataset for each cell type were highly significant, based on empirical null distribution (B cells: n=24, p-value <2.2×10 −16 ; CD4+ T cells: n=67, p-value <2.2×10 −16 ; CD8+ T cells: n=108, p-value <2.2×10 −16 ; monocytes: n=183, p-value <2.2×10 −16 ; NK cells: n=66, p-value <2.2×10 −16 ) ( supplementary figure S5a–e ).