Excerpts

Additionally, certain indicators exhibited marginal significance differences (0.1 > p > 0.05), such as DriSucc% in the elite group and GCA, ShortCmp, Def 3rd, Mid 3rd and DriMis in the control group.

Protein content White soft cheese showed a clearly significant ( P < 0.05) decrease in protein content during the pickling period in all treatments.

Additionally, a trend of lower EPA concentrations (p = 0.063) and higher stearic acid levels (p = 0.062) was observed in high NAL compared to low NAL (Table 2 ). On investigating associations between NAL and erythrocyte fatty acids measured, a positive trend between AA concentrations and NAL (β = 0.197, p = 0.050) was observed, while an inverse trend was seen for linoleic acid (β = −0.172, p = 0.088).

Also, the M-SeNPs and M-CCH groups were highly significant compared to the other groups in all days ( P ≤ 0.05).

TNF-α showed an increasing trend in the BD + L. reuteri group, and chemokine IL-8 mRNA exhibited no intergroup differences (P > 0.05).

Importantly, there was no significant difference between the asynchronous conditions ( t = 0.40; P = 0.69, two-tailed t -test), and there was a marginally significant interaction of visuo-tactile temporal congruence × body type (F 1,28 = 4.17; P = 0.05).

WL and AT had highly significant ( P < 0.05) relationships with the CEF.

Results were considered significant according to GraphPad Prism: *indicates p-value 0.01 to 0.05 (significant), **Indicates p-value 0.001 to 0.01 (very significant), ***Indicates p < 0.001 (extremely significant), ns = not significant (p > 0.05).

A scatter plot illustrating gene significance (GS) and module membership (MM) within the turquoise module demonstrated a highly significant positive correlation between GS and MM ( r = 0.81, P < 0.05; Fig. 1 F).

For insulin (panel A), there was a significant main effect of adolescent exposure (F (1,18) = 12.6; p = 0.002), no main effect of diet (F (1,18) = 2.1; p = 0.15) and a marginally significant interaction (F (1,18) = 4.1; p = 0.05).

Less pronounced was the summer air temperature signal in δ 18 O cell , expressed in marginally significant relationships between δ 18 O cell and July air temperature (r = 0.36, P < 0.05 ), July–August (r = 0.39) and JJA (r = 0.35), respectively (Fig. 2 b).

Only highly significant interactions (p < 0.05) have been considered.

Slightly significant trends (p < 0.05) were detected for concentrations of silicate (negative trend) and chlorophyll b (positive trend).

The ethyl acetate extract of the isolated strain demonstrated highly significant (p < 0.05) antimicrobial activity against multi-resistant bacteria and phytopathogenic fungi.

A p < 0.01 was considered as highly significant, p < 0.05 was considered as significant.

Importantly, there was no significant interaction between congruency, block and experiment, p = 0.10, and only a marginally significant interaction between RT, block and experiment, χ2 (2) = 6.00, p = 0.050.

When PHR was divided into tertiles, compared to the reference group, the odds ratios for hyperuricemia for participants in the second and third tertiles were 1.29 (95% CI 1.12, 1.49) and 1.78 (95% CI 1.54, 2.06), respectively, with a significant trend observed across the tertiles of PHR (trend P < 0.05).

The statistical adequacy of the developed models was validated through ANOVA, with all three response models found to be highly significant ( p < 0.05), as shown in Table 3 .

Harboring the L144S was associated with a significantly longer time to bulbar involvement than K3E (p = 0.0015, log-rank test) and with borderline significance longer time than G41S (p = 0.050), without significant difference between K3E and G41S (p = 0.44).

Focusing on the test phase, we first ran a repeated measures ANOVA on test performance as a function of trial (old, new) and condition (conceptual, neutral), which revealed a main effect of trial ( F (1, 23) = 28.38, p < 0.001, partial η 2 = 0.55), a marginally significant main effect of condition ( F (1,23) = 4.37, p = 0.05, partial η 2 = 0.16), and a significant trial x condition interaction ( F (1,23) = 6.95, p = 0.01, partial η 2 = 0.23).

We annotate statistically significant (P < 0.002) associations in Tables and note nominally significant (0.002 < P < 0.05) associations below.

Pooled analysis Metabolites with nominally significant differences (p<0.05) and trends (0.05<p<0.10) between screening and Year 3 within the FP and AP groups Metabolites that were nominally different are reported in Table 2 with circulating concentrations reported in Table S1.

Tukey-Kramer Multiple Comparisons Test was used to compare means between groups where p < 0.001(***) was considered extremely significant, p < 0.01(**) slightly significant and p > 0.05 (ns) considered as non-significant.

The control and DSEO -3 groups showed a decreasing trend, with peaks on days 1, 6, and 9 for the control and day 9 for the DSEO -3 group ( P < 0.05).

Average methylation values for each cytosine within the Fr_BAG5_APOPT1 fragment by group and haplotype and nominally significant p -values ( p < 0.05) for every analysis conducted are given in Supplementary Table S5 .