Barely Significant

Excerpts

27,100 sentences · 1 filter applied

nominally significantp < 0.051.0× alphagold
Results from PrediXcan 30 (in blood) supported our hypothesis that parents would have higher predicted gene expression than their children when testing dominant and recessive DD genes containing putatively damaging PTVs, but this result was only nominally significant and did not pass multiple testing correction ( p < 0.05) (Supplementary Fig. 9 ).
at the limit of significancep = 0.0501.0× alphagold
The interaction between the two factors, at the limit of significance [ F (3,42) = 2.82, p = 0.050, η 2 p = 0.168] was given by participants’ sensitivity being higher for the full vision condition [ M = 4.04, SE = 0.16], as compared to the limited vision condition [ M = 3.75, SE = 0.19], only when participants were lifting the object [ t (14) = 2.91, p = 0.011, r = 0.858].
highly significantp < 0.051.0× alphaqualifiedgold
In contrast, in the S_ st1 vs S_WT comparison, enriched highly significant terms ( p < 0.05) for down-regulated DEGs included “response to water”, “response to inorganic substance”, “response to abiotic stimulus”, “lipoprotein metabolic process”, “lipid transport”, “lipid localization”, “oxidoreduction coenzyme metabolic process”, “NADPH regeneration” and “glycerophospholipid biosynthetic process” (Fig. 5b ).
highly significantP < 0.051.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The P value is used to identify the significant degree of influence of piping factors on the response of the regression model, P < 0.0001, which shows that the influence of this factor on the regression model is highly significant; P < 0.05, which shows that the influence of this factor on the regression model is significant.
showed a trendp = 0.0501.0× alpha
When ADHD traits at 2 years were included in the model the overall regression was statistically significant ( r 2 = 0.640, F (2,79) = 68.44, p < 0.001), ADHD traits at age 2 significantly predicted ADHD traits at age 3 (β = 0.798, p < 0.001), and Prohibition scores at age 2 showed a trend-level predictive association to ADHD traits at age 3 (β = 0.035, p = 0.050).No other predictive associations from EF performance at 2 years to 3-year autism and ADHD traits were found.
borderline significantp = 0.051.0× alphagold
Subgroup analysis As the initial outcome of OS was borderline significant (p = 0.05), we further analysed OS in two subgroups: SL (S-1 plus leucovorin) and non-SL, depending on the regimen of S-1-based combination therapy, two trials from China and Japan were allocated into the SL group.