Excerpts

Within the cohort of identified known miRNAs, 608 were observed to have highly significant differential expression ( P < 0.01), and 1,014 exhibited significant differential expression ( P < 0.05) when comparing between the experimental and control groups.

Furthermore, TN and TP exhibited a highly significant positive correlation (Pearson correlation coefficient r > 0.80, p < 0.01), indicating that their accumulation in reservoir sediments is closely related.

SOC stocks showed highly significant correlations ( p < 0.01) with elevation, mean temperature, mean summer temperature, slope, length of the thermal growing season, and east–west slope aspect.

Pseudo-bulked expression from 11q23.1 nominally significant trans-eQTL targets, present in the scRNAseq dataset (p < 0.01, n = 273), Fig. 2 a, was then subject to WGCNA 20 .

Results Variation in fresh tuber yield per plant The analysis of variance revealed highly significant differences ( p < 0.01) among the genotypes, year and genotype by year interaction effect for tuber yield per plant (Table 1 ).

Results of correlation analysis in Table S3 demonstrate that there were highly significant ( p < 0.01) positive associations between Pb-Cu ( r = 0.915), Pb-Ag ( r = 0.898), and Pb-Ni ( r = 0.959), etc., in different brands of lipsticks.

Significant effects ( p < 0.05) on phnX, ITS, 16S rRNA , and aphA gene abundances, and a highly significant effect ( p < 0.01) on pqqE gene abundance, were observed.

Post- grouting stage After grouting, the interaction among soil depth, N level, and fertilizer type was highly significant ( P ≤ 0.01) (Fig. 3 d and 4 d).

Differences were considered significant at P < 0.05 and highly significant at P < 0.01.

Data revealed highly significant difference between the three groups in most of the parameters at p ≤ 0.01; where the obese women with MetS had the highest values.

For this, a table of frequency of OTUs was used for analysis, and SparCC correlations were calculated, and only strong (>0.9 or <− 0.9) and highly significant ( p < 0.01) correlations were selected.

The results show that B, E and G were highly significant ( P < 0.01), C was significant ( P < 0.05), and the other factors did not significantly affect the tensile strength (P˃0.05).

Tajima’s D statistic was estimated to test whether the SNPs were neutral mutations 43 , 44 , and the D value for AhGPAT9A was -2.41743, which was extremely significant ( p < 0.01), indicating that the nucleotide variations in AhGPAT9A could not have been a result of the standard neutral selection.

1 A) revealed a significant trend for all-cause mortality among GOLD stages ( P < 0.01 for trend).

All tested factors exhibited a highly significant effect on protease activity, specifically in terms of their quadratic dependence, with p-values ranging from 0.001 to 0.002 ( p < 0.01), i.e., not all factors influence the response linearly nor through interactions, since all coefficients of linear terms and all interactions present a meager value (Table 3 ).

Between 2015 and 2019, an increasing trend in the annual sporozoite rate was observed in the three major vector species both in the lowland (Chi-squared test: χ 2 = 9.04, df = 1, p < 0.01) and highland (Chi-squared test: χ 2 = 8.08, df = 1, p < 0.05) study sites (Fig. 4 ).

Sex and population affinity were highly significant P < 0.01, Table 1 ), but there was no significant interaction of these two factors (P = 0.88).

Statistical analysis was made by Student’s t-test between two groups and the differences were considered to be significant for p ≤ 0.05 and highly significant for p ≤ 0.01.

Such spatial differences were highly significant ( P < 0.01 ), where site VI harboured the lowest abundance with an average value of 608 ± 344.90 individuals L -1 , while site III was the highest (1458 ± 594.61 individuals L -1 ).

There was a highly significant negative correlation ( P < 0.01) between Simpson’s diversity index and mean height.

Highly significant differences ( P < 0.01) were found in the testosterone concentration in the bulls’ seminal plasma used regularly and irregularly.

MUL demonstrated consistent and highly significant associations (p < 0.01) across all outcome measures.

Furthermore, the three-way interaction marginally approached significance, F (2, 136) = 2.96, p < 0.01, η 2 = 0.04.

Among them, the expression levels of Alox5ap , Chil1 , Clec7a , Fcgr3 , H2 − K1 , and Tnnt2 were extremely significantly different (p value < 0.001) between different groups (Normal/ARHL), and the expression levels of Il10ra and Rgs1 showed highly significant discrepancies (p value < 0.01).

Differences were considered significant if P <0.05 (*) and highly significant if P < 0.01 (**).