Excerpts

Differences between AKI and controls were statistically highly significant for both GLCM indicators (p < 0.01).

The differences between 22 pathways were extremely significant between RA and OA ( P < 0.01; Welch’s t-test, Fig. 3a ).

Differences were considered significant at a p -value of < 0.05 (*) and highly significant at a p -value of < 0.01 (**) and p -value of < 0.001 (***).

The relationship is highly significant (p < 0.01) and shows a decrease in [Fe RP ] with increasing primary particle diameter, which is caused by the larger specific surface area of the smaller primary particles 1 , 33 .

Highly significant (p < 0.01) correlation (r = 0.96; N = 270) was found between beat to beat fetal heart rate (FHR ECG ) from fECG and the same (FHR PCG ) from fetal PCG signals.

Of the evaluated attributes, the coarse root weight (CRW) had significant conditional effects ( P < 0.05), while the fine root surface area (FRSA) had extremely significant effects ( P < 0.01).

Regarding amino acid derivatives, 11 compounds showed highly significant differences ( P < 0.01) and 3 showed significant differences ( P < 0.05) among the three groups.

Our results validated that, melatonin shows anti-proliferative action through preserving cells in G0/G1 phase ( P < 0.001) that is associated with a highly significant increase in the expression level of the P53 gene ( P < 0.01).

Pairwise comparisons revealed highly significant differences between Mesolithic Iberia and all other groups ( p < 0.01) except for the Late Neolithic—Chalcolithic Iberian sample, where the results were borderline ( p = 0.051), while the Levantine Chalcolithic group was significantly different from all the Iberian groups (Table 1 ).

The results were considered significant at P < 0.05 and highly significant at P < 0.01.

This enrichment, which also pertains to photosynthesis genes, is highly significant ( p < 0.01, hypergeometric test).

The difference between means is significant if p < 0.05 (*), very significant if p < 0.01 (**), and extremely significant if p < 0.01 (***).

The values were considered statistically significant (*) at P < 0.05 and highly significant (**) at P < 0.01.

Statistical analysis confirmed highly significant inter-district differences ( p < 0.01), as shown in Fig. 3 .

5 A), but the expression of GNPNA , PGM2 , and UAP showed an extremely significant increase ( p < 0.01) at 48 h and an extremely significant decrease ( p < 0.01) at 72 h (Fig. 5 B,D,E).

Significant main effects of storage time ( p ≤ 0.01) were observed for all traits, while the treatment effect was also highly significant ( p ≤ 0.01) in nearly all cases.

The dominant effect of liquid to solid ratio (A) was highly significant ( F -value > 50 and p < 0.01, Table 2 ), which implied that the ratio of liquid to solid was interrelated to the EULP yield directly and the most influential factor was the liquid to solid ratio among the variables.

Maternal MitoQ administration ameliorated MCP-1 expression although this did not reach statistical significance (Fig. 3a ); whereas CD68 expression and F4/80 protein level were normalised in the SEMQ offspring (P < 0.01 vs SE, Fig. 3d ; P < 0.05 vs SE, Fig. 3e ).

The parameters, including dry density (MDD), cohesion (C), internal friction angle (φ), compressibility coefficient (Cc), and swelling coefficient (Cs), predominantly demonstrate a pronounced susceptibility to variations in sand content, as evidenced by their highly significant linear relationships at a significance level of p < 0.01.

From Table 5 , the regression models for the qualification rate, multiple rate, and missing rate are all highly significant ( P ≤ 0.01), while the lack of fit terms are not significant ( P > 0.05), indicating that the regression models have a high degree of fit.

Interestingly, precipitation in autumn among almost all stations shows a decreasing trend with a maximum decreased rate (−11.66 mm/10 yr, P < 0.01) in Kyzyl-Ozek although precipitation insignificantly decreases in other stations.

The maximal methane yield was found from 1.5% NaOH-treated CS (178.6 mL·gVS −1 ), which showed a highly significant (P < 0.01) reduction with increase of concentration of NaOH (Fig. 1f ).

Further, the treatment group also showed a trend to a reduction in fed plasma insulin that was statistically significant on day 14 ( p < 0.01) compared to HFD control (Fig. 4B ).

Significant correlations ( P < 0.05) are indicated by *, and extremely significant correlations ( P < 0.01) are indicated by **.

The screen revealed a highly significant correlation (r = 0.47–0.67; p < 0.01) between ITGB1 and CAV1 expression in all three prostate cell lines studied (Fig. 5c ).