In addition, a strong trend for reduced volume and cortical thickness was observed for the ERC in the BD patients and the PRC in AD patients (0.005≤ p ≤0.05; Table 3 ).
Excerpts
Impact of breakage, breakage position and burial regime on the apical portion The effect of breakage on survival was marginally significant ( P = 0.05) for apical portions that included two interconnected ramets.
+); moreover, there was a slightly significant difference between the number of neutral (0) metaphorical expressions and the number of negative (−) ones, χ 2 = (1, N = 26) = 3.846, p = .05 (0 vs. −).
Secondary analyses Comparisons between individuals with high relative to low maternal cigarette consumption demonstrated a borderline significant reduction in second trimester BPD z score for the high compared to the low consumption group (four populations, mean reduction 0.09 [0, 0.19] p = 0.05) ( S3 Table ) and also for third trimester BPD z score (three populations, mean reduction 0.15 [0.03, 0.26] p = 0.01) and FL z score (three populations, mean reduction 0.17 [0.06, 0.28] p = 0.003), S4 Table .
Other nominally significant associations with INSIGF (P<0.05 and P BH >0.05) are reported in table S7 and in figure 3 .
Out of 576 possible specifications, 192 comprised more than a single study, yielding 135 (70.4%) nominally significant ( p < .05) negative summary effects.
The IPAQ scoring did not achieve significance (defined as p<0.05), possibly as it only reflects activity levels.
borderline significanceP = 0.05
Mortality In the high Hb target versus low Hb target trials, a borderline significance was detected in the risk of mortality with the high Hb group compared with the low Hb group (18 trials, 9859 patients; RR 1.10; 95% CI 1.00 to 1.21; P = 0.05).
Fruit tissue firmness, length, dry weight, and fresh weight of fruit had a decreasing trend (p<0.05) during the irrigation cycle every 5 days compared to the irrigation cycle every 3 days.
Significant ( * ) and highly significant ( ** ) correlations were correlated when P-value < 0.05 and < 0.01 respectively. 2.10.
of borderline significancep = 0.05
Analyses according to baseline CD4 values show a significant higher proportions of undetectability in dolutegravir compared to controls in the subgroup of patients with baseline CD4 levels >200 cells/mmc (RD 0.04; 95% CI, 0.01/0.07); in the subgroup of patients with <200 cells/mmc at baseline there was still a higher proportions of undetectability, of borderline significance (RD 0.06; 95% CI, 0.00/0.11; p = 0.05), in dolutegravir compared to controls, ( Table 2 , S6 Fig ).
Nominally significant (P< 0.05) results were included only when significant (P< 0.01) miRNAs were identified in other tissues.
88.8%), but the difference was only at the margin of statistical significance (p = 0.05, HR = 0.44, 95% CI = 0.19–1.02) ( Table 5 ).
While this did not reach statistical significance, the parallel increase in CD8 + CD45RA − cells from 35% to 42% was significant (p<0.05).
No differences were found in IFS total score ( p = .23) or subscores ( p s > .74), apart from a marginally significant effect in the Conflicting Instructions subtest [with amnestic MCI performing slightly higher than non-amnestic, t (17.62) = 2.10, p = .05].
A significant number of TUNEL-positive cells were observed in the control rabbits that were fed a high-cholesterol diet, and the effects were highly significant compared with those in the normal group (11.1 ± 1.1 vs. 6.9 ± 0.7 positive cells/400× field, P < 0.05).
The main effect of identity strength was marginally significant [ F (4.467,31.266) = 3.651 P <0.05].
Subgroup analysis In terms of the effect size of the amount of change in DCS scores, a moderately significant tendency was observed with “uncertainty” [Z (22) = –1.94, p = 0.05, r = 0.41] and “effective decision-making” [Z (22) = –2.24, p = 0.03, r = 0.48] in people who were living alone and with “clarification of values” [t (49) = 1.90, p = 0.06, d = 0.55] in older adults aged 75 and older.
After excluding these five participants to artificially match the samples on VSWM ( p = .11), the cultural effects on context memory remained marginally significant ( p = .05).
Statistical significance was determined by p-values, with p < 0.01 indicating an extremely significant difference and p < 0.05 indicating a significant difference among groups.
Vasopressor-free days showed a marginally significant difference between the low and usual dose groups [3(0–46) vs 3(0–50);p = 0.05].
There was also a marginally significant effect for the interaction between Hemisphere and Condition (F(4,112) = 2, 458, p = .05).
Impact of TDT prolongation on finger movement parameters GEE analyses using age and hand side as covariates showed that TDT prolongation in PD patients had a marginally significant impact on UPDRS scores for finger movement (TDT, B = 36.039 × 10 −4 , Wald χ 2 = 5.564, corrected p = 0.050).
While some numerical differences existed in the proportions of patients who underwent open vs laparoscopic surgery across the four warming treatment arms, this difference was not found to be nominally significant (P > 0.05) on post-hoc testing of the distribution using a chi-squared test.
Using the 97 th percentile as their threshold for obesity, there was a borderline significant over-transmission of 125W risk allele into obese subjects (P = 0.05).