Barely Significant

Excerpts

33,758 sentences · 1 filter applied

highly significantp<0.0050.1× alphaqualifiedgold
Since the mechanical studies in STAT3-OKO-M mice all yielded highly significant effects (p<0.005), while the studies in STAT3-OKO-BL, despite similar effect sizes, did not achieve the 0.025 threshold, we sought to further confirm our prediction of defects in intrinsic parameters consistent with altered bone quality by determining whether meta-analysis of the combined studies yielded significant effects.
highly significantp=0.00550.1× alphaqualifiedgold
This stunning difference in the numbers of sites of the three site classes were highly significant between intron 2 and the remaining part of the gene (χ 2 : p=0.0055, power=1.0000), and the differences between the subregions were also statistically significant (intron 2 vs. non-cds without intron 2, χ 2 : p=0.0106, power=1.0000, intron 2 vs. cds, χ 2 : p=0.0091, power=1.0000, cds and non-cds without intron 2, χ 2 : p=0.0423, power=0.9989).
highly significantp = 5.8E-030.1× alphaqualifiedgold
Following corrections, PCT remained a highly significant predictor for secondary bacterial infection, positive blood (OR = 1.62, CI [1.15, 2.28], p = 5.8E-03) and sputum cultures (OR = 1.44, CI [1.10–1.89], p = 8.7E-03), as well as for ventilation (OR = 1.47, CI [1.22–1.77], p = 0.000039), death (OR = 1.39, CI [1.15–1.69], p = 0.00077), and ICU admission (OR = 1.48 CI [1.23–1.78], p = 0.000036) by day 28.
extremely significantp = 0.00590.1× alphaqualified
Time matching within reciprocated grooming bouts Analyses of all reciprocated grooming bouts suggested that the relationship between the amount of time each initiator spent grooming the recipient and the amount of time the receiver reciprocated was extremely significant (weighted least-squares regression analysis, F 1,102 = 7.91, p = 0.0059).
highly significantp = 0.0060.1× alphaqualifiedgold
Stratified analyses showed that the association between urinary BPA levels and PCa is highly significant ( p = 0.006) among the 30 patients <65 years old (mean and median age = 58, minimum age = 46) but that this association does not reach significance among the half of patients >65 years ( Fig. 1 ).