Barely Significant

Excerpts

33,758 sentences · 1 filter applied

highly significantP <10 −70.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Statistical analysis carried out on the timing errors, pooled over all subjects after averaging over all repetitions of each condition (four-way ANOVA, 3 [viewing distance] x 5 [ball descent duration] x 2 [figure type] x 6 [character type]), showed highly significant effects of character type ( F 5,1168 = 113.188, P <10 −7 ) and figure type ( static versus dynamic , F 1,1168 = 25.180, P <10 −6 ), less significant effects of viewing distance ( F 2,1168 = 3.602, P <0.05) and of the interaction between character type and figure type ( F 5,1168 = 2.569, P <0.05).
highly significantp<0.00000010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Ethnic Affiliation Related Pattern distributions differences in the various ethnic groups, which returned highly significant differences between the groups at the 5% level (χ 2 , p<0.0000001), have revealed that the Nilo-Saharan Berta manifested significantly higher Arch frequencies (18.68%), which is high both with respect to the other studied local ethnic groups (having arch frequencies less than 7%), as well as relative to other studied populations worldwide [ 3 , 4 ].
extremely significantp = 1e-70.0× alphaqualified
Nevertheless, the observed degree of overlap was extremely significant (5 sites in both log-phase #1 and #2, p = 1e-7; 9 sites in both log-phase #1 and heat-shock, p = 3e-15; 14 sites in both log-phase #2 and heat-shock, p = 2e-18; all p -values computed by hypergeometric distribution), due to the vast number of possible nucleotides evaluated from throughout the transcriptome ( Figure 3 , Table 1 ).
highly significantp<.00000010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
A 2-way ANOVA on proportion of correct recalls revealed no main effect of group (F(1,34) = 3.51, p = .065, r = .25), but a highly significant effect of type of Encoding (F(1,34) = 44.45, p<.0000001, r = .75), and a significant interaction between Group and type of Encoding (F(1,34) = 9.14, p<.005, r = .46).
highly significantp<10 −70.0× alphaqualifiedgold
If we obtain the average expression for all those RBRs and we compared it with the average for the HECT genes, the Pearson correlation coefficient for the expression values in the 79 tissues is positive and highly significant (r = 0.82, p<10 −7 ).
Evolution of plant HECT ubiquitin ligases.
PLoS One · 2013 · PMC3712016
highly significantp<10 −70.0× alphaqualifiedgold
From duplicate measurements for each of three independent DNA preparations per construct, we again saw no effect of shRNA targeting Zfp423 , but a highly significant decrease on overexpression of human ZNF423 (p<10 −7 , Tukey HSD pair-wise test after one-factor ANOVA).
highly significantp = 1.2×10 −70.0× alphaqualifiedgold
For both phenotype traits, highly significant p -values ( p = 1.2×10 −7 for BMI and p = 4.8×10 −10 for type 2 diabetes) were attained for rs1421085, which belonged to LD cluster 3, while the other assayed SNPs except for rs9941349 showed almost equivalent levels of significant association in Asians ( Table 1 and Table S2).
marginally significantP = 1.29 × 10 −70.0× alphagold
rs1456315 was found to be marginally significant in the African American GWAS ( P = 1.29 × 10 −7 ). rs1456315 and rs72725879 are linked ( r 2 = 0.815) in the Japanese American GWAS population and have similar allele frequencies across East Asian populations while rs1456315 and rs72725879 are less linked ( r 2 = 0.448) in the African American GWAS population and have divergent allele frequencies across African populations ( Fig 2 ). r 2 values between SNPs were calculated using PLINK in each individual case-control study.
highly significantP < 1.7×10 −70.0× alphaqualifiedgold
For each parameter and across the 1000 parameter sets, f del shows a highly significant correlation to S , but one that is only modest in value for some parameters (Spearman’s R = 0.16–0.76, P < 1.7×10 −7 , n = 1000 for all parameters), illustrating that S cannot generally substitute as a measure of f del .
highly significantp = 1.96 x 10 −70.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The association between MRS and ΔBMI in non-smoking samples is highly significant (n = 1,243, β = 0.045, p = 1.96 x 10 −7 , R 2 = 0.021), albeit with a slightly diminished effect size estimate (empirical p < 0.0061, calculated using 10,000 random samplings of 1,243 FHS samples) compared to association in all samples (n = 1,508, β = 0.055, p = 5.80 x 10 −12 , R 2 = 0.031).
highly significantp < 0.00000020.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Lab values of included intervals ), mean baseline HIC and SF were not different (p < 0.7 and p < 0.2 respectively); overall, HIC and SF worsened during deferiprone treatment (p < 0.001 and p < 0.0003, respectively), and improved during deferasirox treatment (p < 0.001 and p < 0.0001, respectively); follow-up HIC values differing between deferiprone and deferasirox monotherapies were highly significant (p < 0.0000002).