Cross-correlation analysis showed that the correlation between freezing and reactivations was highly significant (r = 0.9657, p<0.001).
Excerpts
All simple main effects were highly significant (of the 12 tests, smallest F (2,43) = 51.3, p <.001).
For English musicians and non-musicians, the results revealed significant or marginally significant main effects of the following variables: vowel quality [χ 2 (1) = 43.46, p < 0.001], duration [χ 2 (1) = 6341.9, p < 0.001] and pitch direction [χ 2 (1) = 3.52, p = 0.06].
The main effect of testing odor ( Fig 9 ) was highly significant for the probability of alert (F = 35.45; Df = 5; p < 0.001) and sniff time (F = 43.86; Df = 5; p < 0.001).
For the first node, there were seven possible pairs, and it was apparent that the majority of features were extremely significant between the normal person samples and the patient samples (N vs. rest, 57 features with p <0.001) among all these possible pairs.
Highly significant statistical differences were indicated by p values of ≤ 0.001.
This difference was highly significant ( ANOVA, F 1,31 = 38.69, p <0.001).
DDR1 knockdown in BXPC3 DDR1 shRNA5 was highly significant comparing with NT shRNA cells (p<0.001) in microarray and qPCR.
Rayleigh’s Z values for seasonality of leaf initiation were mostly highly significant (Rayleigh tests, P < 0 . 001 , S2 Table ).
A clear trend observed in wealth index, women from richest wealth group revealed more than thirteen-times higher AOR of 13.451 (5.231 to 34.589 at 95% CI, p < 0.001) for institutional deliveries compared to poorest wealth group, which was statistically significant.
We found a highly significant correlation between measured body length and estimated body length (category 1, males: N = 16, r = 0.921, p <0.001; females: N = 18, r = 0.898, p <0.001, Figure 3 ).
Differences in the size of KV between the three maternal genotypic classes of embryos ( figure 4B ) is highly significant (F (3,368) = 36.10, p<0.001), but post hoc analyses (LSD method) revealed no significant difference between WT control (n = 104) and M- msw +/+ embryos (p = 0.074).
When we re-estimated the model after excluding these 426 observations, the overall model fit improved slightly, but the magnitude and statistical significance of the estimated odds ratios changed only marginally compared with the full-sample model (for example, the odds ratio for female compared with male changed from 0.85 to 0.84, with both estimates remaining highly significant, p < .001).
Nevertheless, the between-boar differences for this trait were highly significant (P<0.001).
The increase of U was observed in all cases and was highly significant ( P = 0.001, paired t-test).
Furthermore, the Pearson correlation analysis revealed highly significant (p<0.001) positive correlations of grain yield per plant with the yield components, 100 seed weight, number of seeds per plant, number of seeds per pod, and number of pods per plant at Sékou, Savè and across environments ( Table 5 ).
In an ANOVA, the effect of continent (fixed) was not significant (F = 2.298; df = 1,8; P = 0.204); the effect of site (nested, random) was not significant (F = 1.224; df = 8,4; P = 0.424), but the effect of time (fixed) after application was highly significant ((F = 10.535; df = 4,160); P<0.001).
This difference is highly significant (p<0.001) for the number of nucleotides involved.
Standardized path coefficients for TDP and DOC regarding their effects on BA were positive and significant or marginally significant (TDP: 0.625, p-value<0.001; DOC: 0.460, p-value<0.05).
We observed marginal (r>0.6) but highly significant (p<0.001) correlation between SPA and cytokines such as IL-6, PDBF-BB and duration of symptom.
The Wald test is highly significant, showing that positive information has a weaker effect on placing trust than negative information has on not placing trust (χ 2 = 15.27; p < 0.001).
Both results were statistically highly significant (p<0.001) by Fisher's exact test.
This effect was highly significant compared to all other groups (p < 0.001), indicating a synergistic suppression of MMP-2 when both agents are administered concurrently ( Fig 3A ).
Finally, there was a highly significant difference in predation between the two sites ( site 1a and site 1b ) (gall predation: negative binomial GLMM, estimate = −2.05, SE = 0.44, z = −4.64, p<0.001; the incidence of gall predation: binomial GLMM, estimate = −2.25, SE = 0.31, z = −7.26, p<0.001; predation rate: quasibinomial GLMM, estimate = −2.13, SE = 0.26, df = 521, t = −8.30, p<0.001).
All investigated genes showed highly significant sexually dimorphic expression in juvenile zebrafish gonads ( p <0.001).