AMOVA results for overall population genetic structure within and among the populations were highly significant ( p < 0.001), except for ND1 gene results.
Excerpts
This inter-species difference was highly significant ( Fisher Exact Test, p<0.001 ).
Further, CRs of the RS-14 were between 18.427 and 29.099, reaching an extremely significant level ( p < .001).
The SRTs predicted by the fitted GLM showed a highly significant correlation coefficient with measured SRTs (r = 0.79, p = 0.001), explaining 62% of the total variance.
There was an increasing trend in the incidence of both primary and all-diagnoses of AP (P<0.001).
Car size was also highly significant, F (1,59) = 126.512, p < .001, η p 2 = .682.
The difference was highly significant ( χ 2 = 135.661, d.f. = 1, P <0.001).
This was confirmed by Analysis of Similarity (ANOSIM), where there was no significant difference between cecal versus rectal samples (R = −0.043, P = 0.89), but a highly significant difference between sampling techniques (R = 0.47, P = 0.001) [41] .
All of them showed highly significant heterogeneity (p<.001).
On the other hand, all these variables showed highly significant correlations between the two sessions (RT r = 0.880, p<0.001; global accuracy r = 0.860, p<0.001; target accuracy r = 0.827, p<0.001).
Post-hoc pairwise comparisons (with Tukey correction for multiple comparisons) revealed a highly significant difference in accuracy between monolinguals and bilinguals on the illusion condition (p < 0.001), and no significant difference between the groups on the filler condition (p = 0.96; Table 2b in the S1 File ).
p < 0.05 was regarded as statistical significant (*), p < 0.01 as highly significant (**) and p < 0.001 as very high significant (***).
The differences were highly significant (25.5±3.9 vs . 21.5±4.1 mmHg, P <0.001, Fig. 6 ).
In patients, who had adjuvant therapy (n = 5) the increase in ADC values between pre- and post-EBRT did not reach statistical significance using two of the measurement methods (L-ROI mean , P = 0.084; S-ROI min, P = 0.105), while in patients with no adjuvant therapy (n = 47) the increase was highly significant with all ROI measurement methods ( P = 0.001) ( Table 3 ).
This difference is very highly significant for the incorporated nets (Netprotect®) (p<0.001).
The ANOVA over all the movement groups together was highly significant (F = 261.1; p < 0.001).
While, the levels of sorbitol were decreased with curcumin, the reduction was highly significant (p<0.001) with nanocurcumin ( Table 2 ).
Statistical analyses revealed a high correlation coefficient between the rate of apoptosis of OCs and sFasL production (-0.902), which was highly significant ( P = 0.001).
The ratio of NF-κB genes up-regulated in ccRCC (58/137) is highly significant, ( p -value < 0.001, one-tailed proportion Z -test), when compared to the percentage of all genes up-regulated in ccRCC (3560/17997; ~20%).
There is a significant trend towards more negative average δ 13 C values through time (Student’s t test; p<0.001) and, as with the collagen results, the most variation within Phase V.
Location relative to farm had no effect on chlorophyll (p = 0.13) but the effect of site was highly significant (p < 0.001).
Moderately significant MTAs for PH were found with −log 10 (P-value) ≥3.0 in four environments and with −log 10 (P-value) ≥4.0 in two environments ( Table S9 ) for this marker.
The differences between the values from the 3T3BXB-ER cells as well as the differences between 3T3 and 3T3BXB-ER cells were highly significant (p≤0.001), resulting in a decreased nuclear volume by ∼40% in estrogen treated BXB-ER cells.
Increased vascular invasion score is associated with hormone receptor negative tumors Seven of the data sets had information on ER-status [8] – [11] , [13] – [15] , and six of the sets showed significant correlations between high signature score and ER-negative tumors, five of them highly significant (p<0.001).
A clear trend observed in wealth index, women from richest wealth group revealed more than thirteen-times higher AOR of 13.451 (5.231 to 34.589 at 95% CI, p < 0.001) for institutional deliveries compared to poorest wealth group, which was statistically significant.