Excerpts

Expectedly, all CEQ subscales except the Death subscale correlated negatively (or showed a trend towards negative correlations), with the strongest effect (r = -.36, p < .001) for Fear.

In detail, a highly significant decrease of collagen IV- and Iba-staining was found at the ischemic border zone with respect to the ischemic core (p < 0.001 for both markers; Wilcoxon test), while the signals were further reduced in the contralateral striatum (p < 0.001 for both markers; Wilcoxon test).

The only other significant (or even marginally significant) correlation was between the two risk-taking scores, r( 108) = .37, p <.001.

One-way ANOVA revealed a highly significant difference in Δ F/F 0 among these three groups [F(2,58) = 22.16, p<0.001] and post-hoc analysis revealed a highly significant difference between tg neurons-treated with vehicle and control neurons-treated with vehicle (p>0.001) and between tg neurons-treated with vehicle and tg neurons-treated with doxycycline (p>0.001) ( Figure 3H ).

Critically, the interaction between Lag and Prime was highly significant, F (1, 16) = 20.69, MSE = .002, p <.001.

There was a highly significant association between age and stereo class on both tests (p<0.001, χ 2 -squared test).

A 2×2 ANOVA with the within-subjects factor test (NET, CM) and the between-subjects factor group (patients, controls) showed that the group effect was highly significant, F (1,18) = 15.149, p = .001, η 2 = .457, whereas the results were independent from the factor test , F (1,18) = 0.038, p = .847, or the interaction of test and group , F (1,18) = 1.081, p = .312.

pratensis populations (no plants of XD accession survived transplanting) showed highly significant differences for each of the examined traits (P<0.001; Table 4 ).

Using this ranking, gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA)[ 34 ] of the nearest gene to each HIF-1 α binding site demonstrated a highly significant (p<0.001) association between HIF-1 α binding and positive, but not negative, regulation of these transcripts ( Fig 1E ).

LMM analysis of trapping success data against time (days), allowing for positive autocorrelation between successive trapping sessions, suggested a highly significant increasing trend across May to December (LMM, P <0.001; parameter estimate = 0.00130±0.00035 catch rate day −1 ).

Coefficients of determination (R 2 -values) are given for both regressions, both regressions were highly significant (p < 0.001).

For each parameter, the pattern of results was remarkably similar across the two groups and the four experimental conditions, with a systematic, highly significant main effect of trial in each of the 16 plots (always p<0.001).

The significance level was generally set at p<0.05 (***p<0.001, highly significant; **p = 0.001 – 0.01, very significant; *p = 0.01 – 0.05, significant; >0.05 not significant).

There was a strong and highly significant (p<0.001, slope 1.038 se 0.1392; Fig 8 ) relationship between log woody debris volume and log basal area overall.

However, further adjusting for BMI, resulted in significant difference between the two groups in the odds of hypertension, which was higher in HIV-infected individuals (P = 0.001, Fig 1 , model 3), and there was a trend towards higher odds of diabetes in HIV-infected individuals although the difference did not reach the nominal significance level (P = 0.112); the difference in the odds of dyslipidemia became more prominent while that of current smokers became less prominent (although still highly significant; P<0.001), as did for high SCORE (with the difference becoming marginally not significant; P = 0.105).

We find a highly significant relationship between FA ratio of the CST and motor function (r = 0.56, p = 0.001).

These differences were highly significant (p = 0.001) and suggest that expression of RPRM is lost in GC tissues.

Again, significant differences within the cohort were observed, with highly significant correlations between the C1 signature and PLAU/invasion module (p<0.001), the C2 signature and STAT1/immune response module (p<0.001), and the C4 signature and VEGF/angiogenesis module (p = 0.001).

Differences among the median age at diagnosis were highly significant ( p < 0.001 for Kruskal-Wallis test among all 3 groups and Wilcoxon rank-sum test for subsequent pairwise comparisons among all pairs of disorders).

Intraindividual differences in both BMI and V VAT-T were highly significant (p<0.001).

AMOVA results showed a clear and highly significant difference (20%, P < 0.001) between the southwest Gulf of Mexico and the Mexican Caribbean region as indicated by the most probable scenario (number 2) of phylogeographic break ( Table 5 ; details in Table 2 for scenario and S3 Table for complete results).

We found a highly significant difference in the number of chicks visible between the mid- and late-nestling periods (χ 2 1 = 138.12, p <0.001): on days 6–7, an average proportion of 0.81±0.02 SE of the brood was visible to carers, while only 0.19±0.01 of the brood was visible to carers at day 10–12.

These personality attributes displayed the most dominant effects on SWB, showing large positive coefficient values (2.50 and 2.42 for emotional stability and extraversion respectively) that were highly significant (p-values <0.001).Both variables appeared in all the component models used to compute the model average (relative importance of 1.00 for both).

Differences were considered significant when p < .05(*), and very significant when p ≤ 0.01(**), and extremely significant when p ≤ 0,001(***).

Fish exhibited fewer tandem repeats per CR on average (0.52) than tetrapods (1.22), and this difference was highly significant (Kruskal–Wallis, p < 0.001; Dunn’s test, p < 0.0001).