Barely Significant

Excerpts

5,163 sentences · 1 filter applied

showed a trendp = 0.00820.2× alpha
Among the T cells, CD4 + (42% vs 50%, p = 0.0237) and CD8 + (25% vs 30%, p = 0.09) T cells showed a trend towards increase, while double negative (CD4-CD8-) T cells (35% vs 22%, p = 0.0082) were significantly reduced in the treatment group (Fig. 6f ). 6TdG treatment resulted in significantly reduced expression of checkpoint receptors, PD-1 and Tim3, on CD8 + T cells (PD-1: 8.2% vs 3.5%, p = 0.0097; Tim3: 6.7% vs 3.2%, p = 0.0097) (Fig. 6f ).
moderately significantp = 0.00910.2× alphaqualifiedgold
When the Marine West Coast Forest ecoregion was excluded, a strong, moderately significant correlation was present between the drainage network density (total stream + river length:total area) and the SL BA :burned area ratio ( R 2 adj = 0.66, p = 0.0091, n = 8, Supplementary Fig. 1 ).
highly significantP≤0.010.2× alphaqualifiedgold
Based on the obtained results, the data was considered not significant (P≥0.05), significant * (P≤0.05), highly significant ** (P≤0.01), or very highly significant *** (P≤0.001).
ADAM8 as a drug target in pancreatic cancer.
Nat Commun · 2015 · PMC5014123
an increasing trendP < 0.010.2× alphagold
89 ZED88082A in tumor lesions from pre-CART to post-CART Among the 21 evaluable patients, 89 ZED88082A tumor uptake first declined from a geometric mean SUV peak of 4.0 (95%CI [3.3–4.8]) pre-CART to 2.4 (95%CI [1.8–3.3]) post-CART day +5, whereafter an increasing trend to 3.6 (95%CI [2.8–4.7]) post-CART day +7 was observed ( P < 0.01; Fig. 4a , Supplementary Fig. 6a ).
highly significantP < 0.010.2× alphaqualifiedgold
Analysis of similarity (ANOSIM) between groups of nearby seas found highly significant differences (R statistic 0.561, and no pairs of groups approached this value, P < 0.01), thus re-affirming that the groups represented biogeographically distinct realms.
highly significantP < 0.010.2× alphaqualifiedgold
To filter these TF- coexpression modules, each was subjected to a cis-regulatory motif analysis using RcisTarget (SCENIC) and only modules with a highly significant motif enrichment ( P < 0.01) were retained for further analysis and pruned of indirect targets lacking motif enrichment.
nominally significantP -value = 0.010.2× alphagold
The nominally significant association signal at this lead variant (rs11934731, effect size for the minor allele = 0.029 SD, P -value = 0.01, MAF = 33%) was slightly attenuated when we performed conditional analysis with MEPE p.Lys70IlefsTer26 as a covariate in the model (effect size conditional = 0.021 SD, P -value conditional = 0.06; Supplementary Fig. 1 , Supplementary Data 1 ).