Barely Significant

Excerpts

8,476 sentences · 1 filter applied

highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
All statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism 5.01 (GraphPad Software Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA), with p < 0.05 indicating a statistically significant differences ( p < 0.01 indicating a highly significant difference, and p < 0.001 indicating an extremely high significant difference). 5.
highly significantp -value < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The significance of associations between variables were as follows: in the metabolism of carbohydrates and in the transcription and translation, highly significant in both ( p -value < 0.001); in the biosynthesis of amino acids, not significant ( p -value > 0.05); and in the metabolism of energy, marginally significant ( p -value slightly greater than 0.05).
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
HDL), and genetic (QiMYB-like-1 D165H polymorphism) interactions depending on the distribution of quantitative traits related to biotic stress were only evident for CT content and herbivory index, while TT content only showed highly significant variation ( p < 0.001) with respect to regional grouping ( Table 3 ).
showed a trendp = 0.0010.0× alpha
After ischemia, relative delta frequency was greater, while the relative theta, alpha, and beta frequencies were less after ischemia vehicle, ischemia apigenin ( Figure S1A–D ), and ischemia S3 ( Figure S2A–D ; except for the theta band, which only showed a trend towards being lower) for the entire 72 h recovery period compared with the sham ischemia group ( p = 0.001 vs. ischemia vehicle, p = 0.006 vs. ischemia apigenin, p = 0.030 vs. ischemia S3).
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The data obtained provide evidence that the average inhibition of H 2 O 2 -initiated ROS accumulation by preincubation with 100 μM and 100 nM α-T for 18 h was 75.9% ± 3.1% and 54.8% ± 7.1%, respectively; the antioxidative effect of micromolar and nanomolar α-T was highly significant ( p < 0.001 and p < 0.01, respectively), the effect of 100 μM α-T being more pronounced than the effect of 100 nM α-T under the experimental conditions used ( p < 0.05, n = 4).