Barely Significant

Excerpts

7,030 sentences · 1 filter applied

highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin (KMO) measure indicating good sampling adequacy (0.837) and the highly significant Bartlett’s test of sphericity (11,959.726; degrees of freedom = 171, p < 0.001) suggest that the dataset was suitable for factor analysis.
Perceptions of Adulthood and Mental Health
Int J Environ Res Public Health · 2024 · PMC11204109
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Highly significant improvements were found for aROM in all three groups and for TUG in the hip and knee groups ( p < 0.001) with high effect sizes for aROM (Cohen’s d z 0.88–1.06) and moderate to high effect sizes for TUG (Cohen’s d z 0.41–0.89, Table 2 ). 3.2.
a negative trendp < 0.0010.0× alphagold
The effect of number of repetitions differed between the series, with a negative trend in the first series and a neutral slope in the second and third series (main effect for repetition number: OR = 0.98, 95% CI [0.96, 0.99], p < 0.001; interaction between second series and repetition number: OR = 1.02, 95% CI [1.00, 1.04], p = 0.018; interaction between third series and repetition number: OR = 1.02, 95% CI [1.00, 1.04], p = 0.044).
highly significantp = 0.0020.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Whether the child was born in or immigrated to Canada was also highly significant in the unadjusted model ( p = 0.002); children born in Canada spent an average of 8.0 h (95% CI = 7.5–8.5 h/week) playing outdoors per week, while newcomer children spent less, an average of only 6.2 h (95% CI = 5.2–7.2 h/week) per week.